• HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mental exercise:

    There is a serial arsonist going around

    A house is on fire

    You meet a stranger who says they don’t like to discuss whether the fire should be put out or not, nor whether the arsonist should be stopped.

    If this person isn’t the arsonist, their actions (or lack there of) benefit only the arsonist. They are, at least, an arsonist supporter.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      What if they are fed up with how many people support the arsonist in their area while personally feeling the arsonist should be publicly executed, avoiding discussion on the fire is their way to avoid getting overly angry with every single person they talk to who keeps insisting on talking about their support for the arsonist.

      Or everyone keeps on talking about pro-anti arsonist, and they are one of the few that think dealing with the fire first might be a good idea instead.

      • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Complacence is compliance.

        If everyone in your town was pro-dog rape, would you prefer to never speak up? Would you prefer to stay silent while your dog lives every day at risk?

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most people I talk to like this, in the analogy, used to be firefighters, but realized for every fire they put out, some literal idiot lights 3 more, and to them, they end up feeling like they’re the only one who cares. Pun intended, but they’re literally burnt out.