• ozymandias117@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Would that mean a grenade rarely causes direct damage? The explosion is really only designed to throw shrapnel

    • essell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I guess that comes down to frame of reference…

      You don’t have to hit a guy with the grenade itself, the indirect shrapnel will do the work.

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, just a thought experiment, because we do consider shrapnel ancillary in the case of a bullet…

        I’m not sure if a grenade is a direct or indirect hit

        Rockets are similar where we call it a “direct hit” but realistically it’s just blowing up a large enough area that the target happened to be in the vicinity…

        • essell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Can definitely pick this apart, reminds me of examining forces in secondary school during physics exams.

          My thinking on the original point is that shrapnel is never aimed, even if deliberate, as you say it’s just there, it comes alongside the attacking action.

          Then again, in the sense that shrapnel typically goes directly from one place to another, it’s pretty direct