I think we’ve known for a while their guns are for the minorities, including but not limited to the poor. There are places where one can walk around with a concealed pistol or openly carrying a semiautomatic rifle, but not a 6-inch knife on one’s belt. It’s pretty telling.
The point of an armed populace in term of protecting freedoms is for the people to have enough combined firepower to make tyranny impractical. It’s been proven time and again that an armed citizen insurgency can defeat the US military.
If 150,000 armed Democrats in Minneapolis started taking pot shots at ICE any time they saw them, there would be nothing the Trump admin could do short of nuking the city.
But if I had been there on Tuesday with my gun and started shooting at ICE by myself, all I’d have accomplished is getting myself killed and giving Trump more ammunition.
You don’t have to take the entire military. You just have to have a critical mass of gun ownership that makes them too afraid to deploy. I know we have a whole propoganda ethos around this but our country doesn’t actually mobilize against anyone with a proportional likelihood of shooting back.
Yeah. Yeah they did. I spent the last decade trying to convince leftists that we need to back up civil rights with the risk of mortal violence but I’m pretty sure I convinced no one. Maybe there’s a certain factor of wanting to be victimized by power, I don’t know.
Whenever I ask people in the US why they need so many guns, they say it’s to defend against government tyranny.
So… how does it work for you guys?
The ones who say that are for government tyranny when it’s the tyrants they like in power.
I’m almost more angry that we have to keep saying this same fucking thing multiple times a day
I think we’ve known for a while their guns are for the minorities, including but not limited to the poor. There are places where one can walk around with a concealed pistol or openly carrying a semiautomatic rifle, but not a 6-inch knife on one’s belt. It’s pretty telling.
Why are so many gun-owners short-sighted and self-centered?
Because the NRA specifically targetted that portion of the population.
How “Why don’t you 2A you way out of this??” people think America can be saved:
It worked all right for the Black Panthers.
Until Reagan implemented gun control laws
And Congress passed the Civil Rights Act.
And then nobody ever oppressed blacks again ❤️
Did it though?
The non-GOP party spent the last 40 years demonizing guns and disarming themselves.
That’s how it worked out.
But the blame rests on people who didn’t disarm for not wanting to become “lone wolfs”.
The point of an armed populace in term of protecting freedoms is for the people to have enough combined firepower to make tyranny impractical. It’s been proven time and again that an armed citizen insurgency can defeat the US military.
If 150,000 armed Democrats in Minneapolis started taking pot shots at ICE any time they saw them, there would be nothing the Trump admin could do short of nuking the city.
But if I had been there on Tuesday with my gun and started shooting at ICE by myself, all I’d have accomplished is getting myself killed and giving Trump more ammunition.
You don’t have to take the entire military. You just have to have a critical mass of gun ownership that makes them too afraid to deploy. I know we have a whole propoganda ethos around this but our country doesn’t actually mobilize against anyone with a proportional likelihood of shooting back.
Yeah - and the non-GOP side of the political spectrum doesn’t have that critical mass because the “left” side of the country disarmed itself.
Yeah. Yeah they did. I spent the last decade trying to convince leftists that we need to back up civil rights with the risk of mortal violence but I’m pretty sure I convinced no one. Maybe there’s a certain factor of wanting to be victimized by power, I don’t know.