cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/56719476

Italy fined Cloudflare 14.2 million euros for refusing to block access to pirate sites on its 1.1.1.1 DNS service, the country’s communications regulatory agency, AGCOM, announced yesterday. Cloudflare said it will fight the penalty and threatened to remove all of its servers from Italian cities.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Are they becoming less shitty or is this accidentally doing the right thing?

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      They did as sort of positive thing while praising Elon and Vance, despite both their visions of “free speech” as being “free speech for what I like and not you”

      So a hearty fuck Cloudflare, fuck American tech for one again operating in a country and refusing to follow their laws, and fuck the entire billionaire apparatus who are so deep in the circle jerk they don’t know how to come up for air and not act like fascists for 10 seconds.

      the Italian law is overly broad here, but that doesn’t excuse this behaviour.

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        fuck American tech for one again operating in a country and refusing to follow their laws

        Fuck government overreach. And fuck anyone defending it.

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          You fight government overreach by civil disobedience, not by corporatist overreach in the same manner.

          If you give a free pass to corporations disobeying laws just because you personally dislike those laws, soon you’ll find all regulations are pointless because no corporation follows them…

          Also, there’s no such thing as “governmental overreach” in a well working system that is FOR the people and BY the people. You elect the representatives, you have a say in what laws get passed. I do agree that we could do with a refresher because the current forms of representative democracy are breaking thanks to (primarily right wing) political false marketing with no repercussions, and nowadays we do have a way to have people give direct input on laws and regulations before they get passed, but that doesn’t negate the fact that the government isn’t supposed to be some shady ruler class but rather a form of communal governance.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Nah, fuck Italy on this one. Capitalists demanding censorship to protect their profits are never right.

        • biofaust@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I am Italian and I find Piracy Shield an abomination.

          That said, the consequence after the government enacts this should be to see at least all the technically informed people protesting vehemently if not violently.

          Instead no, sofa is just too comfortable and pay is too high (including the one they get from public contracts), so let’s instead applaud the Elon-yapping corpo that decides this is the one rule to challenge, but not the next one that is to their advantage.

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        the Italian law is overly broad here, but that doesn’t excuse this behaviour.

        This behavior = Going to court.

    • Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re arguing that applying filters would degrade performance for everyone. So… to me that kinda sounds like accidentally doing the right thing.

      • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Seems fairly plausible that they cant change 1.1.1.1 behaviour per country.

        At least, not readonably. Dns is the one place where people spend a lot of effort saving microseconds (and less) on each look up.

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      they probably know that if they start censoring then some portion of users will stop using their DNS because it would prevent them from going to the websites they want to visit