• Panini@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I seem to remember a mention of something like “blacksky” being a small instance that’s technically on a different server or…however bluesky actually works. It was mentioned briefly in an article titled something to the effect of “The Myth of a Protocol” where they were going over all the ways the bluesky isn’t actually a federated social media form in practice, even if it could technically be described as one.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        That’s probably not a different server. The ATproto allows users to use their website’s URL as their handle by essentially adding a text file on their website to prove ownership, but their account is still hosted on the Bluesky servers.

      • Tuuktuuk@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        If it’s connected to the rest of BlueSky, all of its data to any other servers goes through that of BlueSky’s. Even if user on private server A communicates with a used on private server B, the message is routed so that BlueSky’s main moderation team can always affect it – they can block it or they could technically even add to it if they wanted to.

        No other servers on BlueSky have that right. Except servers that are completely detached from all servers connected to that of BlueSky. And their separate network has their own central server, then.