ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoConspiracy theorist antivaxxer struggling with comprehensiondiscuss.onlineexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1external-linkConspiracy theorist antivaxxer struggling with comprehensiondiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·6 hours ago the study makes sure to point out the value of vaccination. I did not mention the value of vaccination In no way does it say that younger men should not be vaccinated. And in no way did I say that. I said young men should not be boosted, I.e. second dose.
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 hours agoNo, you said there was “concrete evidence” that “young men should not have been boosted”. That is opinion, and the study makes no corroborating claim to not vaccinate or boost.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-26 hours agoIronically you are having a failure of comprehension in a thread about failure of comprehension. I suggest you carefully reread the claim made and the evidence provided.
I did not mention the value of vaccination
And in no way did I say that. I said young men should not be boosted, I.e. second dose.
No, you said there was “concrete evidence” that “young men should not have been boosted”.
That is opinion, and the study makes no corroborating claim to not vaccinate or boost.
Ironically you are having a failure of comprehension in a thread about failure of comprehension.
I suggest you carefully reread the claim made and the evidence provided.