Getting downvoted by the majority is your idea of a “point that explains itself”?
Either your point doesn’t explain itself, or you made it poorly. Or it didn’t make sense in the first place.
Either way, the next step any normal person would take, is to ELABORATE. If to no one else, at least to themselves, so as to validate their assumptions.
If you can’t, your point should be dropped.
If you just go “well, it’s obvius” then you didn’t do that. What you did, was ignore potential data.
Getting downvoted by the majority is your idea of a “point that explains itself”?
Either your point doesn’t explain itself, or you made it poorly. Or it didn’t make sense in the first place.
Either way, the next step any normal person would take, is to ELABORATE. If to no one else, at least to themselves, so as to validate their assumptions.
If you can’t, your point should be dropped.
If you just go “well, it’s obvius” then you didn’t do that. What you did, was ignore potential data.