You gonna actually lay out your case for that? Because I’m pretty sure you’re wrong (no shade, I just disagree with your assessment), but it’s hard to say when you haven’t even offered any justification for your argument.
The regime has made overt commentary and motions of hostility toward Canada, and has vociferously stated a desire for lebensraum in Canada, Greenland, and other neighboring countries. When they talk about neo-Monroe doctrine, they’re really talking about neocolonialism. They’re “joking” until they’re not. It’s an established pattern and practice with the regime, now as well as in the first stint they had.
Right, but you have to make a case for what the people in Alberta did that’s treason. Not what the US did. We all know what the US did.
Simply interacting with a potentially hostile foreign power isn’t treason. If I have a coffee with a guy who works for the Iranian government, I’m not automatically a traitor.
What are the specific, treasonous actions that you’re alleging here?
You gonna actually lay out your case for that? Because I’m pretty sure you’re wrong (no shade, I just disagree with your assessment), but it’s hard to say when you haven’t even offered any justification for your argument.
The regime has made overt commentary and motions of hostility toward Canada, and has vociferously stated a desire for lebensraum in Canada, Greenland, and other neighboring countries. When they talk about neo-Monroe doctrine, they’re really talking about neocolonialism. They’re “joking” until they’re not. It’s an established pattern and practice with the regime, now as well as in the first stint they had.
Right, but you have to make a case for what the people in Alberta did that’s treason. Not what the US did. We all know what the US did.
Simply interacting with a potentially hostile foreign power isn’t treason. If I have a coffee with a guy who works for the Iranian government, I’m not automatically a traitor.
What are the specific, treasonous actions that you’re alleging here?