• pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Love that people complain about the length of movies while simultaneously happily siting through eight, hour+ long episodes of Stranger Things over two evenings.

    Especially when many hours could have easily been left on the cutting room floor of most streaming shows, but they need to streeetch the runtime so that the writers can meet their contractual, or whatever other internal requirements.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Love that people complain about the length of movies while simultaneously happily siting through eight, hour+ long episodes of Stranger Things over two evenings.

      Because a movie is a constant continuation, where as each episode has a hard end and you can stop and decide if you want to continue or stop.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 minutes ago

        Except that if you look at the stats, most Netflix viewers binge watch (88% here), and most engage in long binges (70% here reported 5 episodes or more at a time), binge watching is by all accounts ‘the norm’ for streaming service users.

        So while you may be able to ‘decide if you want to continue or stop’ the statistics show that the vast majority of people end up watching much, much longer than a movie runtime - which was my point.

    • toddestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      My favorite is when they they say something like “it starts getting good in season 3”. Like I’m going to watch tens of hours of a show that kind of sucks just to see if it actually starts getting good or not?

      Of course, the reality is that they aren’t really watching the show like I would - as in, they aren’t sitting down and giving it their undivided attention. The show is on, but they’re also on their phones the entire time, or it’s on in the background and they are doing something else, or whatever. Probably one of the reasons why the show feels like it’s full of filler - they need to make sure that someone that’s only sort of paying attention can still follow what’s going on.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Not to completely invalidate your point but streaming shows are pretty formulaic in terms of pacing, with convenient break intervals, and are seldom very deep. Films are harder to break up around a bathroom trip or decide to put on hold until another day.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        Not to completely invalidate your point but have you ever noticed the [pause] button when you’re watching a movie?

        The exception is for cinema films, and any cinema film over two hours long (which is very rare) will generally have an intermission. Not that we were limiting the discussion to cinema entertainment anyway.