• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Are you aware that reducing the energy consumption on monitors is competely irrelevant compared to the giant data centers coming up now, taking as much as power as a full city?

    One typical AI data center ≈ 1 TWh/year ≈ the electricity used by 100 000 average homes annually.

    A very large AI data center under construction ≈ 20 TWh/year ≈ electricity for ~2 million homes annually.

    Fun times isnt it.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        Yes, sort of like if your kitchen is on fire but you also need to vacuum the living room. You should definitely focus on finishing the vacuuming before addressing the fire, because, you know, you can care about more than one thing.

    • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      I personally do reject that kind of thinking.

      “But others are worse” reminds me of the kindergarten…

      EU has introduced energy efficiency levels for monitors based on the potential and we are far from the goal.

      I can’t tear down AI data centers, but I can choose to buy a monitor that does not heat up my living room and leads to a nicer electricity bill for me.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      I’m reminded of this type of absurdity every time my Creative T40 speakers auto-shut off after a few minutes of inactivity, and take 4 seconds to wake up again. Yes, that entire millijoule of (entirely renewable) electrical energy is making a huge difference.