• protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I know quite a few vegans in my life who are amazing, nonjudgmental people. On Lemmy, I’ve been called a “murderer” and a “carnist” for mentioning I’m reducing my meat consumption.

    • rainwall@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Yup. I posted the canadian food “plate” in one of the vegan communties as a sanier counterexample to the new US inverted meat pyramid. Canada fought its Ag industry tooth and nail to publish it. The pretty reasonable “protein” section is largly beans, nuts, fish and then red meat, in a way that mirrors actual health recommendations instead of industry demands.

      I specifically called it a better version that recommended eating less meat. Immediatly hit with “all meat is murder” and had my comment deleted within the hour.

      It doesnt change my personal views on veganism, but it did tell me not to interact with the community here, which is unfortunate. Id like to get more input and perspectives, and hell even recipe recommendations, but nah.

      • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        You went to a vegan community and posted propaganda advocating consumption of animals and you’re surprised at the response?

      • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        It does. It’s just a word for people who follow the belief that it’s normal, natural, and necessary to consume animals.

        Since those people are the invisible majority, it’s often taken as an insult to have their ‘normal’ status get a label. Veganism is the belief that we shouldn’t exploit and harm animals, carnism is the belief that we should.

        Which is hilarious in hindsight, because the reverse happens in other topics. Call someone in other circles ‘normal’ and they’ll throw 15 label names at you for why they’re not normal.

        Carnism would still technically cover “vegan plus (animal-based) bacon”. That’s kinda like saying you’re an atheist but believe in (insert god here).

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          Carnism would still technically cover “vegan plus (animal-based) bacon”

          And this all-or-nothing approach is precisely what I’m referring to. I consider myself pretty well-read, and the only time I’ve ever seen the word “carnist” used in the wild is when someone who’s vegan is hurling it as an insult

          • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            Sorry to break it to you, but if you believe that the Christian god exists yet don’t think there was ever a guy named Jesus that rose from the dead after 3 days, you’re still a theist even if you call it atheist.

            And if you think it’s acceptable to kill pigs because you like their cooked bodies, you’re still practicing carnism even if you call it veganism.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        “I’m reducing my meat consumption by doing (x).”

        “Fuck off, carnist!”

        It really isn’t being used that way when the intention is flagrantly insultive.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        no. it’s a term made up by vegans to describe people who don’t have their ideology. just like how Christians talk about sinners