• magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Admittedly I’m not a hardcore crytography nerd, but I know they’ve been improving things for years, and that message on that mailing list looked like it was 10 years old.

      Not saying your wrong, but Id take it with a grain of salt. Anytime I see a newer encrypted block chain I see it and think whatever improvements have been done here, will eventually bleed into monero because of that. And that unlike the other encrypted blockchain, people will still actively be using xmr for real transactions.

      • Jack Riddle[Any/All]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        You might be right, I have not followed xmr closely. You might also notice that this vulnerability is unlikely to deanonimise you, but the point was more that it is a mistake they shouldn’t have made. Their last audit looks fine, though it was made by a blockchain auditing company which I don’t know. I don’t think there is much harm in using xmr for this, groups who would be capable of exploiting vulnerabilities in this kind of project are unlikely to do so, unless an issue of national security becomes associated somehow

    • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Zcash has opt in anonymization. So it really doesn’t work because any offramp can just not accept any zcash that has been obfuscated. With monero, its all obfuscated by default.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m not sure I’d trust whatever that link is as a source that XMR isn’t secure… I mean, what even is that link?