Guess where I am not going to buy games any more.

  • actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m about as anti-AI as you can get, but that wasn’t a confirmation - it was a non-answer.

    And considering how many things “AI” is getting crammed into, if they’d given a definitive answer, it wouldn’t have been possible to guarantee it - because they’re not in control of every business scenario in the industry.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am genuinely curious why people are so angry and are jumping to conclusions, willing to boycott a company that has done great things for media preservation over an inconvlusive statement about something that will likely have minimal or no effect on them, GOGs employees, or the user experience of their platform.

      AI assistance is a tool. Why would they ban their developers and maintainers from using Windsurf, for instance? Or their design folks from using AI tools to help make mockups? It doesn’t make any sense. If their workforce wants to make use of AI tools responsibly… why is that a problem?

      AI use does not mean they will start churning out slop. And, frankly, GOG is a software distributor/vendor… they don’t have creative control over the games they sell. The AI would be in the behind the scenes development of their platform, not in the products. The only way it’d affect users is if they put it in the user interface somehow (but… how and why would they?)

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am genuinely curious why people are so angry and are jumping to conclusions,

        because GoG was just sold, and its a tale as old as time for a beloved company, to get new ownership, and immediately start making stupid decisions and ruin everything.

      • doublah@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        AI use does not mean they will start churning out slop

        But they already did with that ugly AI sale banner that was taking over half their front page.

      • mudkip@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because it will lead to buggy and insecure service, causing customer headaches. Imagine asking a random number generator to write your payment infrastructure!

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      that wasn’t a confirmation - it was a non-answer.

      Same thing, as far as I’m concerned.

      And considering how many things “AI” is getting crammed into

      What they’re using is clearly generative AI, meant to replace artists. It would be very easy to say they were no longer going to be doing that.

    • gustofwind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean you said it in the second half but the non answer is the confirmation they will adopt it like everyone else in part because it’s become part of institutional tools