It makes sense if you think everyone has good intentions and won’t smear campaigns to imply their opponents are pedos or anything of the sorts. Which is why it doesn’t make sense because someone will use it that way, especially with the existence of Gen AI. Just look at how Andrew Cuomo used gen AI commercial to make it seem like Mamdani was to blame for 9/11.
This is beyond any smear campaign. You act like there was credible evidence that every president before Trump was a pedophile and the public elected them anyway.
Its not that donald trump is for sure a pedophile. Its that there are 350 million people in the USA and there is no need to make someone where its even a question president .
Sounds to me like you’re saying you don’t need any evidence because even questioning whether someone is a pedo is enough to invalidate their candidacy.
I wrote a big ass essay on what your words means and how stupid that meaning is, and then I deleted it because I doubt you’d actually read it. If you were that literate you wouldn’t be vehemently defending the stupid shit you wrote.
How about you pull Trumps head out of your ass and apply your statement to ANY other past or future presidential candidate. Let’s say in the future AOC runs for president and the republicans call her a pedo. Do you think that’s enough to make her unfit to be president? Because that is exactly what your title is saying, that simply by questioning whether she’s a pedo (doesn’t matter how obvious the answer would be) she’d no longer be fit to be president.
I see, you’re republican-brained. Trump is bad so him having pedo accusations (regardless of evidence) makes him unfit while Biden is good so him having pedo accusations (regardless of evidence) doesn’t make him unfit.
This is where we differ because I’m actually consistent in how I apply rules. If Biden gets called a pedo and there are no evidence I don’t think it matters. If Trump gets called a pedo and there are no evidence I don’t think it matters. Just because either is called a pedo it doesn’t matter. The evidence of Trump being a pedo came after the election so, to be consistent, him being called one during the campaign doesn’t matter. Had the Epstein files released under Biden there would’ve been evidence and that would make him unfit.
The only reason I “defended” Trump is because I was actually defending all presidents. Nobody should be considered unfit because of a baseless accusation, regardless of what you personally feel about the candidate. And just to be clear for your republican brain, because you think I’m wrong because you don’t like me, I don’t think Trump is fit to be president. He wasn’t fit the first time around and based on his first presidency he definitely wasn’t fit the second time around.
It makes sense if you think everyone has good intentions and won’t smear campaigns to imply their opponents are pedos or anything of the sorts. Which is why it doesn’t make sense because someone will use it that way, especially with the existence of Gen AI. Just look at how Andrew Cuomo used gen AI commercial to make it seem like Mamdani was to blame for 9/11.
This is beyond any smear campaign. You act like there was credible evidence that every president before Trump was a pedophile and the public elected them anyway.
You might want to read your own title.
Sounds to me like you’re saying you don’t need any evidence because even questioning whether someone is a pedo is enough to invalidate their candidacy.
What a weak weak defense of donald trump…name any other candidate that amounts to half of what there is on trump.
Its sick how intellectually dishonest you are.
I wrote a big ass essay on what your words means and how stupid that meaning is, and then I deleted it because I doubt you’d actually read it. If you were that literate you wouldn’t be vehemently defending the stupid shit you wrote.
How about you pull Trumps head out of your ass and apply your statement to ANY other past or future presidential candidate. Let’s say in the future AOC runs for president and the republicans call her a pedo. Do you think that’s enough to make her unfit to be president? Because that is exactly what your title is saying, that simply by questioning whether she’s a pedo (doesn’t matter how obvious the answer would be) she’d no longer be fit to be president.
Except they did exactly that with biden… youre ill informed and I can only assume a hopeless ideologue.
So I guess according to you Biden shouldn’t have been the president?
Except, according to what actually happened I never faltered in my support and my opinion on trump remained consistent.
I see, you’re republican-brained. Trump is bad so him having pedo accusations (regardless of evidence) makes him unfit while Biden is good so him having pedo accusations (regardless of evidence) doesn’t make him unfit.
This is where we differ because I’m actually consistent in how I apply rules. If Biden gets called a pedo and there are no evidence I don’t think it matters. If Trump gets called a pedo and there are no evidence I don’t think it matters. Just because either is called a pedo it doesn’t matter. The evidence of Trump being a pedo came after the election so, to be consistent, him being called one during the campaign doesn’t matter. Had the Epstein files released under Biden there would’ve been evidence and that would make him unfit.
The only reason I “defended” Trump is because I was actually defending all presidents. Nobody should be considered unfit because of a baseless accusation, regardless of what you personally feel about the candidate. And just to be clear for your republican brain, because you think I’m wrong because you don’t like me, I don’t think Trump is fit to be president. He wasn’t fit the first time around and based on his first presidency he definitely wasn’t fit the second time around.