Obviously there is a difference, but let’s be honest, if the only choices are “we hit the wall with 50 mph” or “we hit the wall with 65 mph”, I think we can agree that it’s not very interesting to vote, when in reality you’d prefer to not hit the wall.
And you said there’s no difference in the two. I have no reason to doubt you did that for the usual reason a person does that.
You’re right, I did say that
R/conservative would love you
Obviously there is a difference, but let’s be honest, if the only choices are “we hit the wall with 50 mph” or “we hit the wall with 65 mph”, I think we can agree that it’s not very interesting to vote, when in reality you’d prefer to not hit the wall.
It’s more than that. It’s:
Hit the wall at 50
Or
Hit the wall at 65 and then all the nazis get out of the car and beat any survivors to death.
You’re right. Both sides ARE the same 😒
First of all, you’re
Then I’d recommend you to read my reply again, because the very first sentence starts with “Obviously there is a difference”
These lesser fascists can’t cope with the fact that greater fascists existing doesn’t stop them from being fascists.
Appreciate the tag request
https://road-safety.transport.ec.europa.eu/eu-road-safety-policy/priorities/safe-road-use/safe-speed/archive/speeding/speed-central-issue-road-safety/speed-and-injury-risk-different-speed-levels_en
This is in km/h not mp/h but there seems to be a dramatic difference
The difference between 80 kph and 100 kph is minor, but again, of course it’s better to be a bit slower.
But why should we choose between fast and faster, when the only sane option would be stop?
You’re right but not voting is not a vote to stop.
True, but hopefully it was understood as a vote for “we can’t continue like that” by the people in power of the democratic party.
Especially after having seen Mamdani win New York, I do really hope that more progressives will be up on the ballots. We shall see.