Democrats are guilty of aiding, and in some cases directly participating in, an internationally-recognized genocide.
And Republicans eagerly participate in genocide as hard as they can… so when you only have 2 choices to compare, the one that does horrible things some times vs the one that only does horrible things and seeks to do the most horrible things all the time, you probably, maybe, want to go with the lesser evil
so when you only have 2 choices to compare […], you probably, maybe, want to go with the lesser evil
Suppose, in 10 years, your choice for president is between a democrat who openly expresses interest in murdering six million Jewish people, and a Republican who openly expresses interest in murdering seven million Jewish people.
Will you still be an unwavering Democrat?
get liberals to admit they would vote for a literal holocaust so long as the color is blue - with this one simple trick!
The Democrats move right when they see the Republicans win. Letting the Republicans win forces the Democrats to move right, because that’s where the votes of people who actually fucking vote go. The reverse would also be true. Letting the country drift further and further right by refusing to support or vote for the only people who would move it in even the least bit leftwards is a special form of brain dead crap.
What is it going to take to bring you back to reality?
Unless you, yes you personally, go on a quest and succeed in making a 3rd party viable in the U.S. (not going to happen), then you have exactly two choices.
If you don’t go for the least evil option when presented with two options, I have to just assume you’re evil.
And an evil person going around calling others supporters of genocidaires is just kind of comical.
And Republicans eagerly participate in genocide as hard as they can… so when you only have 2 choices to compare, the one that does horrible things some times vs the one that only does horrible things and seeks to do the most horrible things all the time, you probably, maybe, want to go with the lesser evil
The lesser genocidaires (sic)
x3
Suppose, in 10 years, your choice for president is between a democrat who openly expresses interest in murdering six million Jewish people, and a Republican who openly expresses interest in murdering seven million Jewish people.
Will you still be an unwavering Democrat?
The Democrats move right when they see the Republicans win. Letting the Republicans win forces the Democrats to move right, because that’s where the votes of people who actually fucking vote go. The reverse would also be true. Letting the country drift further and further right by refusing to support or vote for the only people who would move it in even the least bit leftwards is a special form of brain dead crap.
Would you vote for 1 extra million Jewish people to die and pat yourself in the back?
What is it going to take to bring you back to reality?
Unless you, yes you personally, go on a quest and succeed in making a 3rd party viable in the U.S. (not going to happen), then you have exactly two choices.
If you don’t go for the least evil option when presented with two options, I have to just assume you’re evil.
And an evil person going around calling others supporters of genocidaires is just kind of comical.
So who would you vote for in my scenario?
I will always vote for the lesser evil because I’m not an idiot. What is hard for you to understand here?