fubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoArs Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square106linkfedilinkarrow-up1583arrow-down16 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1577arrow-down1external-linkArs Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.comfubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square106linkfedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareBronzebeard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoThis can and should be done internally. Why would it need to be a third party? Any publisher that cares about their reputation anyway. Fact-checkers are a real thing. They routinely follow up on interviews to make sure authors aren’t bullshitting.
minus-square5gruel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoof course, but the OP said independent
minus-squareBronzebeard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI read that as: someone other than the author.
This can and should be done internally. Why would it need to be a third party? Any publisher that cares about their reputation anyway. Fact-checkers are a real thing. They routinely follow up on interviews to make sure authors aren’t bullshitting.
of course, but the OP said independent
I read that as: someone other than the author.