• LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      We’re going to spend a half million dollars investigating who cut someone’s hair.

      It was likely an accident in an over worked hospital but now we’re going to make sure we make this political.

      • 7heo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Plus, hair is a known source of infections. It is routine to shave hairs in hospitals, as a preventive measure.

        This isn’t anything new either, the shaolin monks (among others) notoriously shave to prevent infections in open wounds and cuts.

        It’s sad for the person’s hair, as apparently it was a big part of their identity, but if it comes down to receiving care or keeping the hair, a choice has been made. It’s a bit disingenuous to complain about the way you were saved, after being saved…

        • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If this was a Sikh man the hair likely would have remained because religious reasons. The moment the guy’s indigenous and they no longer care about those same reasons

          • 7heo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah in this case that’s just wrong. Medicine is science, and science is independent of religion. So that really shouldn’t be the case…