Isn’t anyone he interacts with a spy? As in, every employee, every girlfriend - all highly valuable recruitable assets for foreign powers and business competitors.
There is zero evidence that she was a spy. This is cold war era propaganda that we should really have learned to investigate by now. The source of this information is the US state which has provided zero hard evidence. Journalist are simply citing what the state told them. The evidence we do have points towards her being the head of a singaporean shell company used to sell computer parts in China through Alibaba. This is most likely a hit by the US state to take out a CEO who wasn’t doing what they wanted. He was skirting export restrictions and this is state sanctioned libel meant to remove him from a position of power.
Sure shes spyin, but can you really call her a spy? She was simply stealing national security secrets and getting round export controls for a fake Chinese company. Who amongst us has not done such things.
So there’s no evidence and we’re presenting theories.
She was the director of singaporean companies that smuggled NVIDIA AI chips to private Chinese tech companies and AI proxy datatcenters in SE Asia, bragging to investors about securing access to NVIDIA.
Chinese state policy is to focus on R&D into advanved semi conductors, not to fund corrupt black market smugglers fuelling the AI bubble and not even national security & intelligence, this doesn’t even definitely benefit them, her actions don’t sound like what a spy would do but what a corrupt private businessman and smuggler could.
Not to mention regardless of whether she is a spy or not, there is no actual evidence and the theory of her being a spy proportional to likelihood has instead suspiciously large amount of support from anonymous US intelligence officials, neocons and right wing outlets because it is a far too convenient of an excuse to justify warmongering and espionage.
A spy would be a government agent who’s purpose is to collect and transmit sensitive information from one nation to another with the goal of undermining the target nations security. She is a smuggler who traffics commodities for money, not a spy.
Alternatively you could argue that corporate spies exist but this takes the form of infiltrating a rival company to access private information to be utilized by the spying company for their own private benefit at the detriment of the spied upon company. In our case the relationship was a mutually beneficial trafficking operation.
If merely sleeping with a CEO is enough to convince you that someone is a spy, then let me tell you about about my course where I teach you how you can be making $20k a month in passive income in just 6 easy steps!
The term “spy” might be a little sensational here, but consider that these export controls are in place for (supposedly) national security reasons but also to limit corporate espionage. So maybe she wasn’t sneaking around in a ninja suit and planting surveillance gadgets, but if she was sleeping with him as part of a scheme to circumvent export controls then espionage may actually be the appropriate term for that AND it makes for sensational headlines.
Ooo, I dunno, she is the head of a Singaporean company that sells through Alibaba, open and shut case if you ask me. Definitely a spy, just like the thousands of other execs fitting that description.
Normally the CEO doesn’t resign over a mistress, it’s that this one happened to be a spy. Stocks dropped, people lose money, heads gotta roll
I don’t understand this part honestly.
Isn’t anyone he interacts with a spy? As in, every employee, every girlfriend - all highly valuable recruitable assets for foreign powers and business competitors.
There is zero evidence that she was a spy. This is cold war era propaganda that we should really have learned to investigate by now. The source of this information is the US state which has provided zero hard evidence. Journalist are simply citing what the state told them. The evidence we do have points towards her being the head of a singaporean shell company used to sell computer parts in China through Alibaba. This is most likely a hit by the US state to take out a CEO who wasn’t doing what they wanted. He was skirting export restrictions and this is state sanctioned libel meant to remove him from a position of power.
So she’s not a chinese spy, just head of a chinese shell company to circumvent selling restrictions and sleeping with the CEO.
What would a spy do in your opinion?
Right?! I was laughing reading that.
Sure shes spyin, but can you really call her a spy? She was simply stealing national security secrets and getting round export controls for a fake Chinese company. Who amongst us has not done such things.
So there’s no evidence and we’re presenting theories.
She was the director of singaporean companies that smuggled NVIDIA AI chips to private Chinese tech companies and AI proxy datatcenters in SE Asia, bragging to investors about securing access to NVIDIA.
Chinese state policy is to focus on R&D into advanved semi conductors, not to fund corrupt black market smugglers fuelling the AI bubble and not even national security & intelligence, this doesn’t even definitely benefit them, her actions don’t sound like what a spy would do but what a corrupt private businessman and smuggler could.
Not to mention regardless of whether she is a spy or not, there is no actual evidence and the theory of her being a spy proportional to likelihood has instead suspiciously large amount of support from anonymous US intelligence officials, neocons and right wing outlets because it is a far too convenient of an excuse to justify warmongering and espionage.
That’s another theory and opinion.
A spy would be a government agent who’s purpose is to collect and transmit sensitive information from one nation to another with the goal of undermining the target nations security. She is a smuggler who traffics commodities for money, not a spy.
Alternatively you could argue that corporate spies exist but this takes the form of infiltrating a rival company to access private information to be utilized by the spying company for their own private benefit at the detriment of the spied upon company. In our case the relationship was a mutually beneficial trafficking operation.
As far as they admitted to, yes. We don’t know and never will how much she got from him.
A spy would be gathering sensitive intelligence, i.e. spying, not running a smuggling operation… that makes her a smuggler.
What is the evidence for her conducting espionage?
Tell that to every CIA operative ever.
Not all CIA operatives are spies. I wouldn’t SOG personnel spies either.
Sleeping with the CEO.
If merely sleeping with a CEO is enough to convince you that someone is a spy, then let me tell you about about my course where I teach you how you can be making $20k a month in passive income in just 6 easy steps!
Zero evidence? I guess NVIDIA AI chips are just magically teleporting themselves into Russian drones.
That doesn’t make her a spy. That makes him a capitalist willing to violate export restrictions. As I previously said.
The term “spy” might be a little sensational here, but consider that these export controls are in place for (supposedly) national security reasons but also to limit corporate espionage. So maybe she wasn’t sneaking around in a ninja suit and planting surveillance gadgets, but if she was sleeping with him as part of a scheme to circumvent export controls then espionage may actually be the appropriate term for that AND it makes for sensational headlines.
Ooo, I dunno, she is the head of a Singaporean company that sells through Alibaba, open and shut case if you ask me. Definitely a spy, just like the thousands of other execs fitting that description.
But are those other execs also sleeping with CEOs of foreign billion dollar companies?
Depends on how sexy the jackets are.
I’m confused as to which side you’re on right now but that was funny lol
She looks Chinese at least, ipso facto spy, if you’re a rascist prick at least.
Yep. Spy face. Like pieface but tastier and more spy-ish.
Right obviously, I should have thought of that