• bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Crazy idea here: How about not monitoring the ink at all?

    Why does the printer need to know? It’s not like it’s going to explode from not having fresh ink anyway. Just put the ink in a visible container where the user can look and see if it being empty is the cause of a shitty print.

    I’d buy any printer that doesn’t attempt to monitor the ink.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe so people know to buy a cartridge so it’s on hand before the one runs out, so you’re not having to run to the office supply store in the middle of an important print job? But that’s more of a convenience thing, not necessary.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, just make it work like a car’s fuel tank. It has a gauge to say how much is in it. It has a hole so you can add more. Some cars will guess how far you can drive, give or take, based on how much fuel is in the tank. If the fuel gets very low, a more obvious warning will pop up in case you weren’t watching your gauge. But otherwise it just keeps driving in the meantime and if your car needs high octane and you give it low, it will try to run it anyways and if it fucks up the engine, then that’s on the user.

    • jay9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Actually with some print heads they will be damaged if there is no ink

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      If it is visible to the user, that means light is hitting it and helping degrade it. Given how rarely people prove these days, you are more likely to end up with a gunked up cartridge.