floofloof@lemmy.ca to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前CDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1874arrow-down19cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1865arrow-down1external-linkCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前message-square124fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarekernelle@0d.gslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down5·5 个月前Science doesn’t need politics, politics needs science.
minus-squarezeca@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·5 个月前science needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.
minus-squarekernelle@0d.gslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·5 个月前Science doesn’t need politics to tell what is what, it’s science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down3·5 个月前No it surely doesn’t. Politics can exist with no new science.
Science doesn’t need politics, politics needs science.
science needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.
Science doesn’t need politics to tell what is what, it’s science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.
No it surely doesn’t. Politics can exist with no new science.
It can, but it shouldn’t.