• heleos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    I tried Gentoo recently and I really liked it when I finally figured everything out. I wanted the latest packages similar to arch, but I was basically spending at least an hour every time I started my computer updating. I still really like Gentoo, but it just isn’t for me right now. I appreciate what it taught me about Linux though

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Compiling dependencies for an hour or so every time I wanted to install something also got a bit old.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      What did Gentoo teach you about Linux?

      I main it (and am never switching again btw), but I learned absolutely nothing new. Packages build themselves, and everything works.

      I was hoping to learn new things about compiling from source, but I guess I will have to make ebuilds for that.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        True.

        Before I first ran emerge in 2007, I thought from all the “you compile” talk, that you ran a lot of make install (and chasing down dependencies manually) to do Gentoo. Didn’t realise it was easier1 than many other distros to install packages. I thought it would necessitate a lot more getting up to my elbows in source code, hands on with compiling. Nope [not if you don’t want to]. Convenient easy-peasy.

        1 At least, in so far as emerge is shorter to type (than e.g. apt-get install or pacman -S)

      • heleos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I guess more about setup and what other distros do for you behind the scenes. Everyone always talks about how bare bones arch is, but it still does a lot behind the scenes with config and setup, especially with encryption