• vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      224·
      3 days ago

      Is he the one constantly spewing hateful shit in the Issues on GitHub whenever people ask him to not use only “he” and “him” in the docs?

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        1·
        9 hours ago

        Constantly? Or once?

        And was the “hateful shit” a single request to keep politics out of the project and stay technical?

        And was the request to be more gender neutral granted?

        I mean, I have not drilled into it. But I keep reading these complaints on Lemmy and the only link I have seen features a single response from him. It feels like a lot of manufactured controversy.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        81·
        2 days ago

        That dev definitely doesn’t seem like the best human around, but this is all around terrible to me. Calling the project “dehumanizing” and “vile” because of this is ridiculous. Are people really willing to have their browsing tracked and sold rather than using a browser that has an assumed gender in the documentation? Not saying that they shouldn’t use gender neutral language, but as the original issue said, it’s a minor nitpick, let’s be honest. It’s also something that’s representative of one dev as a person, not of the project as a browser. Additionally, it could be something as simple as the dev coming from a gendered language, where the word “user” itself is masculine, and doesn’t see it the same way as English speakers asking for neutral language.

      • TheFadingOne@feddit.org
        271·
        3 days ago

        I’ve only tangentially picked up things about this but this is an example for it

        (For some context, if you didn’t already know this, Ladybird originated from a SerenityOS component and the first reply is from the lead dev)

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          1·
          9 hours ago

          What are we reacting to here? The single comment from the actual dev saying that the project wanted to avoid politics? Or the actual hateful comment from some bystander?

          Ladybird has split from SerenityOS and from that community. Hopefully the bystander has been left behind.

          As for the actual project founder, if all he has ever said is that one statement, I am impressed with his level of restraint given how some have vilified him for it.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            1·
            9 hours ago

            I cannot see who made that comment. Pretty sure it is not the dev who is getting crucified. I am not sure it is even anybody that contributed to SerenityOS or Ladybird.

            I certainly do not see anybody from the project endorsing that language.

            I mean, I read the comment on Lemmy. Should I now go around saying not to use Lemmy and using that quote as evidence for why?

          • Turret3857@infosec.pubEnglish
            6·
            2 days ago

            was that nukeop? that Guy is a known asshole. He was also quoted Saying licenses don’t matter and threw a huge fucking hissy fit when someone forked his project and gave it a copyleft license because of making such a stupid statement. Unfortunately the website archiving the drama is down, and I could only find an archive if the first iteration of it (it had at least 2 more paragraphs after this) https://archive.is/UT9Xe

        • toothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl
          102·
          3 days ago

          Oh… That’s… Disappointing. Firefox it is, then, for now.

          It’s weird… It makes “business” sense, too. If you want people to use your stuff and you can choose to appeal to more people, why wouldn’t you? I think we’ve reached the stage of normalcy now where using “they” and “them” are not in itself something that would necessarily scare away right-wing users (given you want to keep appealing to that attractive market, too.)