• NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    So you would like a plan that uses the same amount of bandwidth and power as they used back then, with one skippable ad, for free?

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yup.

      YouTube could easily avoid AdBlockers by simply having ad part of the video itself. Not pulling it from a different server, not hijacking your video player to prevent user controls, just part of the video like any other part of the video and AdBlockers would not be able to detect it. They’re not going to do that though, because then users won’t be forced to watch an ad they have no interest in.

      • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do you realize how low quality your stuff would be?

        Then people would bitch that they can’t get the high quality version for free

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Do you realize how low quality your stuff would be?

          YouTube makes $30 billion a year. They’ll be fine.

          Then people would bitch that they can’t get the high quality version for free

          Reducing the max resolution for people who aren’t on YouTube Red will come next once they stop focusing on AdBlockers.

          “Service quality will continue to decrease until profits improve!”