I don’t see the point in doing men’s vs women’s clothing sizes. Surely there’s a big enough variance in size and shape between individuals that it would be more useful to size based off of measurements of body shape?

Take shoes for example. Why is a uk men’s size 10 so wildly different from a UK women’s size 10?

All it seems to achieve is making shopping for clothes difficult for anyone that doesn’t fit into the expected body shape for their gender and make it hard to find well fitting clothes outside of specialist shops.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tradition plays a huge part in it.

    Why do so many women’s dresses zip up the back? Because servants used to be a thing. Same reason women’s shirts button differently than men’s; someone else was supposed to be dressing the lady.

    Even fifty years ago in New York a man could be arrested for wearing something the police considered “women’s clothes.” and NYC was considered a loose town with easy morals

    • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      The zipper in th3 back also helps if you have a big chest and don’t want it bifurcated by a zipper.

      And you can’t put that same zipper (if it goes all the way up the back) on the side… if you have wide hips.

      So at least that still has reason to exist.

      Source: my own body and never wearing a front-faced zipper after seeing why we don’t do that.