Much better: when this happens, I block frames and scripts from loading through ublock.

I know a work colleague who does. He sees Kethamine Karen as a “visionaire” and someone who really knows his stuff.

It’s not being self-unaware. It’s just that, for them, a person is white. The rest, eh…

No, no. You got it wrong. The key is what do they consider “people”.

“Are you brown or are you a person?” Is how they work.

I’d start hiring hitmen to kill every billionaire in the world.

There’s also another thing that comes to mind: people taking melatonine are usually people with trouble sleeping, which is already a factor on heart failure.

It’s just a simple matter of concepts.

HIS economy is not the same as the economy of his voters.

Just because you had a shitty life doesn’t mean you can make other people’s lives miserable.

I was bullied during most of my childhood and highschool years. Are you telling me that I should sympathise with my bullies because they had a rough time? I had an awful time thanks to them and I didn’t go making other people’s lives shitty. And I didn’t have their sympathy either.

For my bullies I don’t have sympathy. I don’t have hate either, because they don’t deserve anything from me.

See? But you didn’t address anything because, by your own admission, you didn’t read my comment. So you don’t even know what you are criticizing. You are just butthurt because someone dared to defy “your freedom”.

Just admit that you don’t want responsibilities for your words. That’s it, that’s all you are saying. And that is a very MAGA thing.

You are trying to debate something you haven’t read in the first place. And you ask me to “respect logic”. I mean… try respecting logic?

You just seem offended by something you simply refuse to read, which is very much in line with what MAGAs do. As I said, you are not ready to discuss the limits to free speech and the concept of “consequences to what you say”.

You keep sounding like a maga snowflake that doesn’t like when their words bring them consequences. It’s fine tho, I understand that you are not equipped to understand the nuances of freedom of speech and its limitations.

“I’m a free speech absolutist who can’t read and believes that people shouldn’t be held responsible for what they say”.

You’re not a critic, you just sound awfully like a maga snowflake yelling “but muh freedom!”.

Not butthurt at all. I just accepted that I’m not discussing with someone capable of reading a comment beyond the first sentence of it. It’s fine tho, I’m not gonna explain it again just because you refuse to read the first comment.

I can

do it b

smalle

Ah… I see… My bad, I understood it too late that I wasn’t talking with someone able to fully read a comment before making a “sharp” remark about it.

It took me a minute too long to realize that the white parts of the map were land and the grey ones were water.

I need my morning tea before I keep scrolling…

So you didn’t read past the first sentence, got it.

Is that what your attention span lasts? Or are you leaving the rest of the comment out on purpose for some reason?

I don’t see the problem with that.

I think the main focus here should be the word “influencers”.

One thing is for a relatively unknown person to speak about any kind of topic even if they know nothing about it.

But when someone with millions of followers spreads misinfo, that is dangerous as it can end up killing lots of people.

People with a certain amount of followers should be held accountable for what they say the same way that a newspaper should.