AnonTwo

Didn’t the animal tests lead to pretty bad deaths? And wasn’t that less than a year ago? I can’t imagine this going well.

Plus there was the blind-tech that was revealed not too long ago where now that they’re bankrupt the group is slowly going blind and worse. I feel like none of this is going to end well.

So really you’re only playing moderator because you’re for it, and don’t want people to vote against it.

I mean, VR is a thing still. It’s just still niche at the moment. I don’t think it has to be the main way to enjoy entertainment.

That said, I’m pretty sure the glasses you want are AR, not VR (Augmented reality)

It’d be nice to trace an artwork back to it’s source. But I don’t think this is actually practical.

So is this basically saying youtube isn’t allowed to detect an adblocker?

I’m not sure I really follow why that specifically is something they’re policing.

Is there no government oversight for “Uhh no you aren’t?”

Given the recent animal testing results this seems like assisted suicide

Then there’s no way the non-pro models can use monitors, let alone 4k HDR. Pretty sure even if you power the monitor separately it just doesn’t transfer the data fast enough.

I spent months trying to use a portable monitor with a USB-C 2.0 port until I found out there’s different versions and only 1 actually works for it.

So wait, does it have a displayport?

Because I saw news saying that some models would have USB-C 2.0, only USB-C 3.2(? FastDelivery) supports monitors. So unless it has a second port there’s no way this is true.

Video game consoles exist for the sole purpose of playing protected content,

Consoles have never been good at handling protected content. I’m pretty sure they have higher piracy rates than PC, purely because PC will emulate them.

Pretty sure the main reason has always been form factor and self-contained. People get consoles because they don’t want the setup that a PC entails. That and up until around 10 years ago maybe, PCs were prohibitively more expensive than consoles.

But hell, even back in the 90s my first experience with Pokemon was on no$GB

I’m guessing because then states would need to heavily modify code laws on things like fire alarm requirements. Those regulations are for anyone who might have to walk into your house.

He set most of it on fire the moment he purchased it, since it wasn’t even really worth that.

I think it would be better to think of it like a cigarette patch

The goal is to lower your activity to your assumed essentials, and eventually stop entirely when you start replacing it in your daily activities.

It makes it easier for people either on the fence or just not entirely comfortable with trying something new.