![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Dude was not a consumer, it was a volunteer, a big difference. And, as far as I know, they follow the required protocols for these types of trials. Everything else is speculation.
Dude was not a consumer, it was a volunteer, a big difference. And, as far as I know, they follow the required protocols for these types of trials. Everything else is speculation.
Presumably, the person who volunteered knew all the risks and implications, so you can shit all you want on their decisions but that’s how trials work. There’s no promises of you coming out with a functional product.
Good comment, but check your uses of “then”.
That’s how names work in some asian countries. Family name takes precedence.
Here in Brazil, EULAs (they are called adhesion contracts here) can only deal with the way service is provided and cannot limit consumer rights in any way. Even if the contract has these types of clauses, they are considered void by default.
These types of things never fly here.
It is not a sustainable business model because when it becomes paid people will realize they don’t need them.
The ability to kiss boys does not make you gay.
That’s too specific to justify the engineering effort.
Now it only lacks the blackjack.