Pawns are the first pieces to be sacrificed in a game of chess. How deep did you go to pull out this comment?
Maybe the first to loose a pawn in game are statisticaly more prone to loosing. But that’s will be Tue reason of being the worse players not that the piece in itself is so important.
I selective use AI for low risk applications.
I can use it to reskin a picture to a water painting or whatever for the purpose of using it as an icon in a smart home app or similar.
i also use it to clean audio for memes with friends.
At the moment its not reliable to solve actual problems. I simply don’t use to for those purposes because it sucks.
Not at all. It’s designed to displace unwanted people from areas as soon as capitalist powers see it fit.
It’s how you get forced to sell the property owned by your family through generations because some capitalist powerhouse wants to “develope” that particular area at the time.
Only taxation that should exist is on income. Then its up to the state to tax it fairly. Screw every other sneaky ways to siphon the resources from lower classes.
Racial stereotype. What do you mean? Imitating an Indian scam call from a scam factory in India having a conversation with you is viable with an Indian accent if it adds to the story.
Every time I tell a story of a french person being upset about something minor I always add a french accent to help develop the story.
Telling any story of a cultural exchange with a monotone AI voice isn’t really normal.
Most scandinavians don’t buy individual bottles because of the drinking water quality. water is usually available most places. And it’s always free in regular cafes and restaurants in Norway if you ask for it.
It’s solvable if the state does what’s it’s supposed to.
There wouldn’t be a market for bottled water if water was clean and readily available for free.
The bottled water industry is way worse in Norway than in Spain for example.
What was the motivation when the Aztecs or Mongolians did it?
The motivation is not ethnicity. It’s resources.
Always has been.
Not allowed.
Name_1_Body-type_A Name_2_Body-type_B
Does the luggage handler receive the money then?
Thanks for your answer. Om considering the DXP4800. I’m forced to buy one soon because my drives on the desktop are soon full.
I’m in the market for my first NAS. Synology made the choice a bit easier.
Thank you.
Why should they receive money from the state anyway? Its a private school for the elite. Funneling public money into the pocket of a diploma factory isn’t good use of the tax money anyway.
I disagree with Trump’s motivation, but I can’t disagree with the result. The money should go to free schools.
This thread is an example why Lemmy wont succeed as the new reigning image board.
Yes sure. But that doesn’t play along with the current narrative. So history shouldn’t be brought up like that. This is about revisionism. We all should feel guilty for something we have no power over so we can discuss non issues instead of actual problems.
I have no doubt the car will crash.
But I do feel there is something strange about the car disengaging the auto pilot (cruise control) just before the crash. How can the car know it’s crashing while simultaneously not knowing it’s crashing?
I drive a model 3 myself, and there is so much bad shit about the auto pilot and rain sensors. But I have never experienced, or heard anyone else experiencing a false positive were the car disengage the auto pilot under any conditions the way shown in the video with o sound or visual cue. Considering how bad the sensors on the car is, its strange they’re state of the art every time an accident happens. There is dissonance between the claims.
Mark shouldn’t have made so many cuts in the upload. He locks the car on 39mph on the video, but crashes at 42mph. He should have kept it clean and honest.
I want to see more of these experiments in the future. But Marks video is pretty much a commercial for the Lidar manufacturer. And commercials shouldn’t be trusted.
I have no doubt the car will crash.
But I do feel there is something strange about the car disengaging the auto pilot (cruise control) just before the crash. How can the car know it’s crashing while simultaneously not knowing it’s crashing?
I drive a model 3 myself, and there is so much bad shit about the auto pilot and rain sensors. But I have never experienced, or heard anyone else experiencing a false positive were the car disengage the auto pilot under any conditions the way shown in the video with o sound or visual cue. Considering how bad the sensors on the car is, its strange they’re state of the art every time an accident happens. There is dissonance between the claims.
Mark shouldn’t have made so many cuts in the upload. He locks the car on 39mph on the video, but crashes at 42mph. He should have kept it clean and honest.
I want to see more of these experiments in the future. But Marks video is pretty much a commercial for the Lidar manufacturer. And commercials shouldn’t be trusted.
So Tesla owners have a monopoly on caring about the process of an experiment?
A logic conclusion by that is anyone not a Tesla owner is incapable of critical thought?
How is this a win?
Agree. It was a chore listening to it. Good it’s short.
Edit* it’s one of the pieces of literature that can’t be reviewed anymore. Like 1984.
1984 is good with the whole world building thing. The moment our protagonist falls in love and fuck the chick in that field its over.
Awesome cognitive detoration. Congratulations.
Its the same logic as cobcluding that people who draw swatikas on Tesla stores are amthe actual Nazis. You can’t comprehend any context.
She was in Norway like a week ago. Woman’s busy.
She would be better of protesting in Saudi Arabia or stopping some russian shadow fleet ships before supplying the Russian war machine.
We got the Temu version of a radical protestant instead.