the teuton lecturing us good people of the world about adolf hitler. that’s rich. what did your grandparents do between 1933 and 1945?

They did find the people responsible for this. They attacked them on October 7 2023, remember?

I am actually interested lol, but it seems like you don’t actually have any better model to offer. So China’s it is.

Sounds neat to me! What models in particular would you say are more creative?

They held Keiki Shield #18 only in 2023. That’s how often they have to set these up.

Why do you trust the Tibetan government in exile? What have they done that makes them trustworthy?

^ this is actually whataboutism

This is a LARP. It’s fine to have hobbies. It just shouldn’t be taken as truth and posted as news.

This fake government levies what they call the chatrel tax from all Tibetans except nobody has to pay it obviously. But from the language you’d think it’d be illegal not to. https://tibet.net/support-tibet/pay-green-book/ It also gives you a ‘green book’ which serves as your fake fantasy passport, because citizenship is granted on your ability to pay taxes apparently.

neat

I figured that might be the case 🤦‍♂️ indian outlets at the top of search results usually seem to be.

What’s the difference between an opinion section and what you deem “speculative conspiracy theories”?

As a matter of fact what’s the difference between their front page news and the NYT directly quoting Bush making the case to go to war with Iraq? Weren’t they also passing off speculative (Saddam was responsible for 9/11) conspiracy theories (Iraq had WMDs) as News?

Or is the problem that they are more famous than me thus their opinion is worth more than mine?

You didn’t answer any of my questions and your hostility is more funny than anything. Do you also get this kneejerk reaction when the NYT or the Guardian publish an opinion piece calling to bomb Iran? Because these count as news, they’re published in real newspapers after all!

Isn’t it world news that “Israel” attacked Lebanon twice with compromised pagers, or do articles have to come from state-approved sources to be considered news?

This is a self-promoting opinion piece boring on conspiracy theory.

What makes you say “conspiracy theory” exactly?

Wikipedia is not a source bruh. In the introductory paragraph on the uyghur genocide article they say that thousands of mosques have been destroyed… But don’t mention they have been rebuilt to accommodate more people or because they weren’t up to code. There are more mosques in Xinjiang alone in 2021 than there are in all of Europe lol.

Wikipedia has a clear agenda and this is clear from looking at their board of directors and demographics. They are not a source and neither are their sources - - they are carefully curated to offer a specific analysis.

This has been tried before in different ways; infowars, parler, even giving them r/thedonald (as some believed it kept them off other reddits) … It has only led to fascists finding a platform to start working their poison and spread it outside.

In fact isolating only worked when moderators finally did something and deplatformed them, I.e. Banned these communities. After Alex Jones was taken off youtube, infowars died. Spencer was punched so much he stopped leaving the house (and so stopped propagandising). Milo was canceled everywhere he went (literally), but especially on Twitter, and last I heard he filed for bankruptcy.

The best way to isolate them is to fragment their communities so much that any organisation is impossible. And of course prevent them from creating such communities. If you let them have their spaces, they will find them, they will go on there (and they’re very good at using the edgy aspect to lure in new recruits), and then you end up with another terrorist attack. They will organise on there and that’s what you want to prevent.