Walk on the front of your foot, the process require you to intentionally concentrate on your gait which causes it to change

Not that you can do it all of the time, but it is a way to defeat gait fingerprinting.

There is way too much money on the side of spreading disinformation to know much of what is true. The Groyper angle is possible, but the evidence is thin at best. It doesn’t take much for people to ignore the scarcity of evidence if the story sounds better to them.

I just meant that online groups contains all kinds of people, and there is no reason to believe that that particular group is free of radical or violent individuals.

Remember when the Right was against cancel culture? Cracker Barrel remembers

Exactly.

It used to mean the far right that wasn’t mainstream Republicans, now it’s the mainstream so there’s nothing alt about it any more.

Criminalizing your political opponents is very much on brand

All of them?

That seems like something that you cannot possibly know.

Anecdotally, you saw some “fat white kids” crying, that’s not evidence of anybody’s behavior but their own.

I agree that we don’t know if he is a groyper, but implying that the group isn’t capable of containing of containing violent individuals is a very naive viewpoint.

What was the resolution?

It was a .30-06, a 7.62mm round, similar to an AK-47 (ARs uses5.56mm). They make big exit wounds.

Given how close the round hit to his brain and the fact that it hit a major artery, he likely died due to the hydrostatic shock from the impact.

He likely didn’t even know he was hit, he was seizing immediately and all of his body motion after the impact was involuntary.

You can disagree with political violence and also not be upset that he’s dead.

Conflating the two is disingenuous

I played it in Proton from the beginning

I can sum up this topic for basically every game:

If I can’t beat it, it is too hard.

If you can’t beat it, it is because you suck.

You get what you pay for.

“It”? Are you conflating the low parameter model that Google uses to generate quick answers with every AI model?

Yes, Google’s quick answer product is largely useless. This is because it’s a cheap model. Google serves billions of searches per day and isn’t going to be paying premium prices to use high parameter models.

You get what you pay for, and nobody pays for Google so their product produces the cheapest possible results and, unsurprisingly, cheap AI models are more prone to error.

It doesn’t take an AI genius to understand that it is possible to use low parameter models which are cheaper to run but dumber.

Considering Google serves billions of searches per day, they’re not using GPT-5 to generate the quick answers.

Exactly.

The model that responds to your search query is designed to be cheap, not accurate. It has to generate an answer to every single search issued to Google. They’re not using high parameter models with reasoning because those would be ruinously expensive.

Same, I enjoyed the gameplay but every item drop was far less exciting because I’d need to pause and consult a wiki before making a choice.

I’m using Deepseek R1 (8B) and Gemma 3 (12B), installed using LM Studio (which pulls directly from Hugging Face).

It isn’t unique, it provides text, voice and video chatting. These are not new services to the world of technology.

What makes Discord stand apart is that they require that your chats, calls and streams are not private and, in exchange for people giving up their private data the users only have to install one piece of software instead of two. It is like a company giving people a ‘free’ phone as long as they or their advertisers can listen into the calls, read the texts and look at the videos on the phone.

The only thing that Discord does is to package the software in such a way that you can’t access it until you give them information about you and then they gate features behind you identifying yourself with a credit card and a phone number.

Sure, in the most extreme cases it would be obvious to the crew. But simply making mistakes at a higher rate than humans will result in a lot of unhappy customers.

It’s pretty different.

Heart rate and vision have objectively correct ways to measure them. Bot detection doesn’t.