It is not an urban legend if it actually happened lol

I stand corrected, thanks! I always assume they’re finding a way to directly enrich themselves further, because they often are.

But isn’t it true that whatever they don’t pay in taxes via writeoffs, they get to keep and use however they want? They might choose not to give themselves a bigger bonus with those savings on taxes, but…I do doubt it for some reason

Well they will make the donation, but they’ll do it with your money, and then they’ll take the tax deduction for it, and reward themselves with a nice fat end of year bonus from the tax savings. Isn’t capitalism fun?

Please explain English to me in a way that “no one was starving” and “there was one famine” aren’t contradictory

You literally said “no one was starving” though

They’ve mastered the art of getting people to pay attention to them. Neither of them give a single fuck about the super bowl halftime show

hostis hominum

Well that answers my question of how this got past an editor, even in the 70s

Well that’s fair then. I do clean my floors once a week. Maybe they’re dirtier than others’ on average, but I think I’d clean them once a week no matter how much dirt there is. So I guess to me it doesn’t make a noticeable difference, but I would agree that wearing shoes indoors objectively brings more dirt into the house.

I’m sick less than most of my friends on average and I wear shoes indoors when it’s more convenient than taking them off. Germaphobes can hate it but I hardly think it’s really that bad for anyone’s health

I suppose we’ll see, I just have a feeling the dust is still settling and cards are being held. But I may be naive, I have been before

No need to apologize, it’s something easy to confuse, I learned it from someone correcting me once. Cheers!

How about we treat him like other “criminals” in the us and stop asking nicely. Go put an officer near his vehicle with a loaded weapon while he pulls out of a parking spot

I haven’t seen that the officers were identified in Prettis murder. I’d be nervous to charge a federal officer who will have federal defense attorneys on video evidence alone when the fed has everything else I need. But I’m not a lawyer. I was just saying they clearly would like to press charges from what I’ve seen. I think they will, but are trying to make sure they don’t get screwed in court first. They have open lawsuits to ensure evidence doesn’t get destroyed by the fed. Why would they do that with no intent to charge?

Isn’t it moreso that they can’t get access to the evidence they need to successfully charge people?

That’ s not how medians work, unless there’s the same number of people of every single age watching.

If the population watching is:

10,000 10 year olds

10,000 20 year olds

10,000 30 year olds

10,000 40 year olds

10,000 50 year olds

10,000 60 year olds

300,000 70 year olds

10,000 80 year olds

10,000 90 year olds

Then the middle point of that range, when you list them from youngest to oldest, would be 70 years old.

The only thing they’re rethinking is how to repackage this so people accept it. They learned a lot from this, but I promise you it wasn’t the right lesson.

Didn’t you also help found that FTX crypto exchange a few years ago too?

I swear I’ve read this sentiment before somewhere…