But until then, if your neighbor yells “I think you all should die” out his window

but when he in the street with a NAZI flag

There is a difference here:

Window dude is being a nuisance that should be dealt with. But he isn’t being specific, nor is he showing any tendency for violence. He’s just being a shit bag.

Nazi flag dude is out in the street, his views are specific and violent. They are a call to commit violence on a mass scale towards minority groups. Nazis (and fascists of all kinds) frequently get violent, without being the first to be hit.

Yelling out the window is a warning sign, waving a Nazi flag in public is an act of hate, and demonstration of an adherence to a violent ideology.

And we were asking how specifically you are going to help. Good bye.

We asked you questions, and you lashed out with hurt feelings. Please go find help.

You seem to think that we know what your goals are, and how you handle problems you haven’t said anything other than a desire for a nationwide strike against something incredibly vague as to escape everyone else’s grasp. We can’t help you if we don’t know what needs to be done. The rest of how you are talking is as a bad faith troll. Answer the earlier questions and maybe people can help you.

Oh, so people can’t ask you questions. Got it. Troll.

You put forth an idea, people asked for your opinion on an issue to achieve your goal, now you are calling us bad faith actors. Grow the fuck up.

You don’t bust down his door, but when he in the street with a NAZI flag, feel free to bust his nose.

So what’s your plan? IS “yes anding”. We are asking what your ideas are about having the strike, while addressing specific concerns that we see as hurdles. What we are looking for is a new idea to deal with these specific problems. Do you have any new ideas to get these people onboard with something that is currently in opposition to their stated desires? Don’t be swinging on those who you seek to ally with.

Ah, you seem to think people asking questions is some sort of opposition. You also seem to think that we should be onboard with your ideas (without you sharing details) otherwise we are stupid and holding you and progress back somehow.

There you go, making assumptions. We aren’t against the idea of a strike if it could be done effectively. Which requires the VAST MAJORITY of a population. So what’s your plan to get, say 35%, of those who voted for Drumpf to join the cause? Because the major issue to getting a nationwide strike to be effective is having a majority of the population on side.

Edit: Formatting

And you aren’t the only person who has ideas.

You want a strike? Let’s hear your plan to convince the 50% of people who have the government and conditions they want.

Edit: it’s so clear you’re stirring the pot as you point the finger at us because we want to know the answer to a question that is a major issue for your desire.

No, these are vaild questions. How are you going to mobilise the American populace when about half of them like Drumpf?

So when is violence in response to fascists and specifically Nazis okay? Because they start with rhetoric then move fairly quickly on to violence. As in we are in the last part of their rhetoric as they are now openly waving flags without challenge.

I took it as the statement of an uncomfortable fact that we have to deal with. And saying “too soon” is what the gun lobby in the US says after a school shooting.

Thank you for sharing

A proper education would have done it.

No, it’s not.

Well, if they want a broken jaw, we should oblige them.

Look, not killing them is a debatable point. Not meeting their violence with overwhelming violence leads to this kind of shit