Alt-Account: lemmy.world/u/Hubi

Matrix: @hubinator:matrix.org

  • 2 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • He’s the best example of someone falling upwards. He’s not much more than a cash cow for other people running the companies that he owns and their successes are not happening because of Musk, they are happening despite of him. It goes as far as SpaceX allegedly using “handlers” to keep him from interfering with the actual development. I’m pretty sure that you, as a mod of [email protected], have more technical experience as the guy who claims to be the genius behind Tesla.

    The reason that Musk is making these obviously dumb decisions at Twitter is because it’s 100% his toy to play with and there’s nobody else running the show for him. What we are seeing is essentially the unfiltered effect that he has on a business.



  • For the same reasons that fast food is popular. It’s basically dumbed down mindless consumption. I used to be on reddit because I could talk to like-minded people about interesting topics, but the vast majority of people on the internet just want to be entertained and with the support of the admins, they ended up taking over the site. Sure, there are some niche communities where you can have valuable discussions but their time is limited. It’s essentially an artificially accelerated Eternal September.
















  • Hubi@feddit.detoTechnology@lemmy.mlShould AI images be copyrightable?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    If you have trained the model or part of it yourself, I’d say yes, some copyright should apply to that. Depending on the images that were used of course. The copyright should apply less to the generated image and more to the model itself. You should also be able to copyright images that have been sufficiently altered after the initial generation IMO.