On the other hand if the number keeps going down it helps strengthen hope that it can go down to 0. When these things happen some apparatus gets left behind on how to do it a again for rogue actors inside the country too.

Except we shouldn’t be giving corporations same rights as individuals. Doing so leads to corporate feudalism.

Those should be your expectations when you are on the shop floor and that should allow you to reject the purchase if it’s s deal breaker for you. Not when you’re crossing railway tracks.

When it’s been advertised to the user as “full self driving”, is it?

I wouldn’t believe an advertisement.

No because you will be using duckduckgo or something else

Jokes on them, I am a grumpy bastard who hates emotionally expressive humans.

As opposed to being bland and boring?

Same here. Disabled it a year back.

I don’t agree with your argument.

Making a human go to prison for wiping out a family of 4 isn’t going to bring back the family of 4. So you’re just using deterrence to hopefully make drivers more cautious.

Yet, year after year… humans cause more deaths by negligence than tools can cause by failing.

The question is definitely “How much safer are they compared to human drivers”

It’s also much easier to prove that the system has those issues fixed compared to training a human hoping that their critical faculties are intact. Rigorous Software testing and mechanical testing are within legislative reach and can be made strict requirements.

It’s supposed to work like that. You’re naive to think it actually does work like that for a majority of companies nowadays.