![](https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/00be6193-b3ab-400b-9374-f640eb98cedf.jpeg)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
You can go ahead and say ‘Evil’.
You can go ahead and say ‘Evil’.
prolly Heinlein, wierdo sex type, but some useful ideas…
No, it’s like they won’t. Cost / benefit says no…
Ye canna change the laws of physics! Acceleration is proportional to force exerted (F=ma) and has nothing to do with the amount of energy stored, which gives you range. You might get a few percent efficiency bonus from lesser acceleration due to losses (so 2-3 extra Km per 100), but you can’t “trade acceleration for range”
Try LanguageTool. Free, has browser plugins, actually made for checking grammar.
This speaks to the kneejerk “shove everything through an AI” instead of doing some proper research, which is probably worse than just grabbing the first search result due to hallucination. No offence intended to @EdibleFriend, just observing that humans do so love to abdicate responsibility when given a chance…
preferably a unionized trade, more staying power…
Line must go up!
And the techBro war on skilled wages continues…
It’s not the science, it’s the strategic and economic advantage. Not sayin it’s right, just sayin.
Narrator: They were lying about not using the data. They already had.