

That’s wrong.
The current economic model is based on the Keynesian model, popularised by explicit detractors of the Austrian school.


That’s wrong.
The current economic model is based on the Keynesian model, popularised by explicit detractors of the Austrian school.


Right, the labour theory of value is not pseudoscience then? It’s based on empiricism? Care to substantiate that with literally anything other than “Marx said so”?


1 was purple and 2 was orange, green was the last color left.


Most people still don’t know anything about AI, whether it be llm based or otherwise; they just think it’s magical, knows everything, and they should use it for absolutely anything without any discernment.


Because less and less legitimacy and authority is vested in the individual and their bloodline, meaning even dictators can be replaced.


I assume “how” is referencing the “change your habits” part, because getting off social media is simply a matter of choosing to do so, so I’ll answer accordingly.
Changing habits is not easy, in my experience finding hobbies you like is a great way to get out of your routine which then helps you notice what habits make you less happy since you’re no longer just going with the flow, but YMMV on that.
In general, it takes time and effort to vet your habits.
I’m not a professional, so I don’t have concrete methods other than my own, which is to “test” them: stop doing the thing for a week, assess how you feel afterwards, then go back to it and see if you feel better or worse.


Sounds like some shepherd reference could be good, since it’s herding the agents.


It does not matter if you look at twitter on the official app, a frontend, your neighbour’s door’s peephole, it’s still twitter, it’s still a cesspit, curate your feed better or leave it altogether.
Socialism is an adventist secular religion. It provides no tools to alleviate suffering because it is based on the whole concept that problems will be solved “when the revolution comes” and “when we abolish private property” and so on (see this comment for a perfect example).
If you want to feel better, do what you can to improve your situation now. This means: find a better job, change your habits for better more fulfilling ones, stop doomscrolling social media designed to rot your brain keep you engaged, find a better friend circle if the people around you reinforce these feelings of doom.
The feelings of “can’t find love” have a lot to do with the people you hang out with, or lack thereof if your social media diet takes up enough of your mental energy to impact your feelings.
Go touch grass, find a hobby to do with others, preferably groups of mixed age, background (sex, race,etc), and beliefs.


Usually, financially stable parents who pay for their kids’ clothes, phones, cars, etc. will say, “I paid for it, so it belongs to me.”
Financially “stable” just above the poverty line or formerly poor parents, yes.
In my experience, rich people don’t look at the bill or who owns what.
They will occasionally use the concept of having supported someone financially as a cudgel, depending on the person, but they will never go “well those shoes I bought for you are still mine because it was my money” cause the shoes don’t matter nor does the money used to buy them.
It is literally “the thought that counts”, because the dollar amounts are trivial.
As for who owns what in the broader sense of family fortunes, that really depends on what kind of wealth and the culture they are from. Are they old money? are they nobles? are they new money? This will largely dictate who is actually in control of the “family” holdings.


They meant artistic quality, not resolution and bitrate.


I bought a WiiU for Bayonetta 2.
Not only was the WiiU itself little more than a paperweight beyond running it, the game itself was extremely lackluster and simplified.
I didn’t even bother emulating bayo 3.


The latest in a long line of walking simulators aimed at sad over-the-hill American millennials.
Everything I see of it feels borderline focus tested to hit the dopamine centers of random game journalists like a stinger missile annihilating a civilian target.
Hard pass.


I have 2 instances of jellyfin. One is my regular home streaming, the other contains 32000 legally downloaded porn scenes (originally ~6TB, converted to x265 down to about 1.2).
It’s great to have to spice up the foreplay every now and then.


Hell, it might be the last reliable piece they have left, I’m fine with them not vibe coding that out of the codebase.


I don’t see how replacing one form of sycophantic validation slop with another would help, if not maybe for the fact that socialist theory is non-interactive.
Hey, nothing to be sorry about, you’re doing this for free and were quick to fix the issue too. Thanks, I’ll give this a spin!
You should probably add a section on how to remap the ports if need be, port 3000 is pretty common and unlikely to be free on most setups that run more than a handful of containers.
I for sure am not figuring it out since I seem to be stuck in a loop where Jellyfin correctly replies to the login request (at least if its logs are to be believed) and then cliparr boots me back to the source selection screen.
ETA: the issue seems to be with using HTTP instead of HTTPS, quite annoying not to get any error messages to that effect, even though they can be found in the browser console.


You wouldn’t have been able to stop yourself from buying a copy for yourself and everyone you know if it were available, huh?


He’s been a plumber for 40+ years, he will know what it would have cost you, if you tell him what happened.
You can be matter-of-fact about it and not belabour the point by catastrophizing a possible outcome.
“Hey dad, we dodged a bullet. A fitting was loose but they caught the leak and there is no permanent damage, I’m going to go fix it”
If he’s not an idiot he won’t need reprimand, he’ll know he fucked up, and the potential size of the fuckup.
How is this proving anything about broader economics? Or any of Marx’s boondoggle social claims?
This just says that calculating the summation of all labour costs is a good predictor of the overall cost of production and thus price, Marx makes way broader and wilder claims than that.
Defending marxist views on the LTV with this paper might as well be a motte and bailey; there is no substantial dispute that the sum total of costs is a decent predictor of an industrial good’s price (industrial production per-product margins are notoriously slim), while there is plenty of dispute that the generation of “surplus value” causes “alienation” and “dehumanization”.