So, this is what passes for nuance these days?

“Janet?”

The CEO is not the issue here.

The man sold 50k stocks in the company just this year, 2k of which the day before the announcement, he knows this is suicide.

The board needs to go, but the reality is that unless you go private there’s not much to do on that front.

In fact, when they do fire him, don’t expect things to change. This is an Ellen Pao maneuver.

I really don’t understand why she hasn’t had better reception and support from the US maker community and tech press.

She’s hot, hyperfeminine, and has spicy political opinions.

It’s one of those situations where the lack of preconceived notions from a ml algorithm allows it to try a bunch of stuff humans would often discard off hand, which sometimes pans out.

It’s one of the best things about ML based systems that they can make mistakes faster than humans, so they can re-validate or correct our existing understanding of the topic.

Oh LMAO, i was thinking of the classical latin(/italian) version of the alphabet. I always forget j and k.

He would join HAL in having an acronym that’s shifted by 1 letter: IBM>HAL, AI>BL.

Yeah this seems to presume that people care to fact check which, if these last few years have proved anything, they don’t.