Wtf, breaches aside why would a health care company be working with advert companies?
I haven’t played around with them, are the new models able to actually reason rather than just predictive text on steroids?
Oh no, how will people know if their opinions are right or wrong without our top most social ethicists?
Our collective toilet thoughts are going to fuel the future of robot rhetoric guys
That sounds about right to me, maybe throw in government supported and nonprofits
I do—I support a handful of creators (including some web content creators) directly via patreon, and donate to the important guys like wiki and craigslist. I don’t support any news organizations and am not sure how they’ll pivot.
I already click right back out of websites that don’t make it easy to reject cookies or ask for an email. I certainly won’t be registering anywhere and will find other ways to get the information I need. At this point I am immediately turned off by anything that relies heavily on ad-revenue to exist anyway.
I am much more comfortable using self checkout
The article is about matching different fingerprints from different fingers of the same person (something we apparently thought wasn’t possible) rather than finding different people who share fingerprints. AI can do it with 77% accuracy which they say isn’t enough to convict someone by itself but could help with narrowing leads.
Clearly nothing can change the status quo if it doesn’t also make trillions
AI doesn’t seem to do well when it trains on its own data so I do think there’s a possibility it’s a one trick pony. Once there’s too much AI content in the data it’s trained on it will devolve into nonsense.
Interesting thought about the visibility
Deepl’s “write” tool (the one I linked) gives style suggestions
Opinions vs deepl?
i are, I generally have to make about the corrections per message in order for it to even be legible
(left it in all its glory for you guys)