I thought Twitter was once forced but a court to enable blocking for all users against all users. Isn’t this why we are able to block advertisers?
I thought Twitter was once forced but a court to enable blocking for all users against all users. Isn’t this why we are able to block advertisers?
Rat sues mouse for spreading diseases.
Use AntennaPod. Free, open source and allows you to subscribe to all free podcasts. It has a search over three podcast indices included, which gives you anything that is openly available on the web.
If you created anything good or funny on suno, feel free to share it on [email protected]
Yeah I would expect that. Why would the average consumer pay extra for “AI”, if they don’t really know what to do with it. And if they can’t even brag about it to their friends, because everybody knows how flawed it is.
So AMD’s “AI”-supporting CPUs are bound to flop now?
No one likes being manipulated. I like ads that promote healthy living for example, if they don’t secretly promote any brand or product. They are pretty rare though, almost only in some public health care facilities.
They can surely work around that… But if the client somehow knows where the ads are, the adblocker can skip them anyways.
But maybe also deep linking is less important than ads to them.
In the USA, they call it the AlaLlama model.
Free speech and so on.
This feels unreal.
“former”
Do people outside of tech care?
Does GDPR apply to stackoverflow? Since my data there probably does not identify me as a person?
Some other countries have the decency to add something like “of the USA” to the name. But this being the USA, of course he is just “the” president.
Imagine if twitter some day opens its gates and starts federating with everyone. Then the musk takeover would have actually improved the world. Even though it hurt his purse a lot, but that is also an improvement I believe.
Yeah this is really scary. Maybe the golden thing on the top right is supposed to be the marking? But this is clearly not clearly marked. Should be easy to sack in a court.
This may be on purpose though. They communicate to their future shareholders that they will do everything - legal and illegal - to make profit and pay dividends.
deleted by creator