The GOP will never support clean cut voting laws, they have to manipulate the votes to win anything they haven’t had the numbers to win an election since Nixon. That’s the reason our voting laws are convoluted in the first place.

I used it the other day when a kid on my bus buckled the extra 5th point harness on himself that can’t be taken off without assistance, which he doesn’t require, and I warned him if he puts it on I won’t take it off until the destination. He tried bargaining, but I told him I’ll die on this hill. He’s only 5, but he got that it wasn’t going to do anything other than what I said. Also, I know for a fact all he’s going to do if I take it off is immediately put it back on. And it can’t harm him, it’s just an extra strap on a harness.

This is why you don’t ever drive on anything but clear road.

They are an extremely small amount of people, so it’s very easy to target them for hate messaging.

When farmers burn weeds they often mix a popular petrochemical that’s sold at most beer/cig/candy stores and simple Irish bars of lavender, it’s pretty useful stuff. For burning weeds.

the demands of the public and candidates of quality with people behind them is what creates change. Burnie changed the DNCs policy commitments, even if he couldn’t produce enough votes to be the candidate, he effected change, and that only happens when people are politically engaged and dousing people’s desire for change or anger about abuse doesn’t effect change.

I’m Hispanic, I grew up in an immigrant neighborhood, this situation is a nightmare, and every president we’ve had has made it worse since Clinton, but pointing out the Democrats will gladly continue Trump’s immigration policy to appear “strong on immigration” to me is highly counterproductive. people are mad right now about immigration policy, people want change. telling them any Democrat that runs is going to be the same when we don’t know who that person is or what policy they have written down as a plan of action, it’s just telling people to be more hopeless, and not be mad or demand change. No voting Democrat won’t fix immigration, but voting republican will always make it magnitudes worse, and people finally seeing what policy is like and being strongly against it is the only way to get a political party to actually openly be pro immigration for once in my entire life.

You are again misunderstanding what they are saying. they clearly said it had use as a search engine, not research in any academic sense.

sounds like starting a parallel business with out AI could possibly replace this company you work for…

What could possibly go wrong?

very hard to convince someone of something when their paycheck requires they don’t understand it. seroiusly “hay I’m one of the people who has been demanding my company finish AI and roll it out and stuff it into everything we sell to look like massive growth so my stocks will start going up even though the language models aren’t even designed to do what were claiming, and they don’t even work well as language models, and we have no real use for them and they’re horrifyingly costly to run, but no, I don’t think it’s a bubble.”

when your whole public assessment of others is explaining your ability to be sexually attracted to them, then yes. really gotta notice your publicly talking about someone for a lot of them to happen.

sounds like… sounds like your attracted to people over the age of 18… you monster.

the appeal she lost was that the tats and piercings make it abundantly clear she’s over 18, and college attendance shows she’s not going to be easy to manipulate and take advantage of. you know. because she’s an educated adult. that’s the big turn off. trust me. that’s ALWAYS the turn off. this guy would say all sorts of nasty stuff about her body if the average 14 year old had tats and piecings.

that’s why a lot of them are a placard you can take down. Also, you can just look up how often in real life responders have not realized a baby was involved in an emergency situation, it’s happened. It’s not a “you’re too stupid” type of thing. it’s more just making sure it’s known.

The baby on board stickers are too alert first responders that if they find the vehicle after an accident or some other emergency that they need to look for a tiny human as well as children/adults it’s not too pressure drivers to get them to not drive crazy, there’s really nothing for that. Just hang out by a school zone cross walk during release you’ll find out just how good people are at deciding to drive safe for children and the law.

This is a pretty perfect explanation of why you’re not going to see AI being used for anything serious in the art world for a very long time. you can’t randomize your character designs every time you need more than one clip, angle, iteration, that breaks the function of comercial art entirely. Yes I know it’s technically been done, but it’s exactly what people call it, AI slop. You can’t randomize every element of a film every time you need a new shot, a cut, a new scene with the same characters, backgrounds, or lighting.

Yes. They very much are intending to cause harm with every step. I’m old enough to know, they’ve been doing this all my life. The violence didn’t start when you decided it started, it’s been happening a long ass time.

Not in line with current party doctrine. You gotta regurgitate the newest talking points.

He didn’t think to call Venezuela his own personal property? Free State of Venezuela. What a fool.