A scant couple hundred thousand more brain cells and we’ll be there.

Cheap shot, I’ve never dared a soap opera myself.

Murderbot.

Murrrderbooooot.

800,000 brain cells played pong.

Creepy.

That’s murderbot’s ancestor.

Digital IDs that Protect Privacy.

Protection From Digital ID Corruption.

Anything concise that conveys a couple core points

A great point in dire need of a better title.

Bummer, I didn’t downvote you.

I think that’s the nature of the beast here, don’t take the fake Internet points too seriously.

The phrase “privacy nightmare” gets thrown around a lot, but an online service taking pictures of your screen every few seconds does not sound worth the risk of exposure of personal information.

As for someone needing physical access to your device in order to access those screenshots, there’s no way that’s correct.

If they’re locally stored on your machine, those screenshots can be accessed by an intruder.

Seems like a long walk for an extremely limited scope of benefit.

Drowning a baby in bathwater.

What is the stated reason for this proposed function?

This is the first I’ve heard of this terrible and invasive idea.

Uh-Oh, now kytch is getting sued by the law firm kytch was using to sue Taylor because kytch apparently hasn’t paid that law firm.

https://legalnewsline.com/stories/657650426-va-law-firm-hopes-to-recoup-at-least-7-million-in-attorneys-fees-from-kytch

I can’t see a huge difference between openai 3.5 and Claude on ddg, but they are both beating copilot hands down.

If I ask copilot a specific question, like when was the first year this product was released in the United States, it’ll describe the product stuff tell me about the product without mentioning the year, while the ddg chatbots both answer a similar question immediately and accurately.

My only problem is that unless I’m missing something, ddg botsdon’t provide the source they’re getting the information from, which I do like a lot with copilot, that I can make sure the source they’re pulling the information from is accurate immediately because the link is provided.

Whoa, awesome. I just tried it and copilot, which I did like, has been supplanted.

I’m getting way more accurate answers.

You haven’t entered a discussion, you’ve cried incredibly short-sighted neoconservative talking points that I’ve completely taken apart in my other reply to you.

I attacked your ridiculous comment, not your character, unlike your personal insults.

You’re labeling me a “reactionary” because I didn’t call you any of the slurs you listed.

You might want to sit in that a while.

Actually, I have time, so let’s dismantle your comment.

"Keeping thieves and robbers from entering your house is not, ‘immobilizing yourself.’ "

Nobody said it is.

“The idea that America would be immobilized by taking care of itself instead of carousing around with the rest of the world is just silly.”

Something nobody said again, but:

Thinking that having literally enough land to fit people and resources to perpetuate some contemporary level of technology ignores all of history and every metric of national success.

You know who had overabundant physical resources and separated themselves from other civilizations?

Incans.

“Canada could also seal off its borders and in a thousand years from now still be going strong.”

So we ignore Canada’s transportation imports, machinery imports, electronics imports, plastics imports, energy imports， services that alone account for 1/3 of Canadian GDP, then Canada will “go strong”?

5 winter months a year without cars, oil or modern manufacturing to compensate for the weather, not to mention financial services, infrastructure services, science in every form; they’re sunk.

Oh and we can’t forget that you are wishing away Canadian exports, which also account for 1/3 of Canadian GDP.

Your canadian isolationist whim has zero legs to stand on and 1.5 trillion dollars of debt annually.

“International relations are the cause of war” in the same way that air is slowly poisoning you to death.

Such a zoomed-out, irrelevant statement ignores literally every significant factor of conscious reality.

There are two hundred ish countries.

Show me the thriving utopias that refuse to interact with any other countries.

You’re arguing the international merits of “separate but equal” while ignoring how much the United States and other countries have benefited from open borders.

You are wrong top to bottom here on every short-sighted jingoist allegation.

“Afraid of your neighbor’s dog? Never leave your room, add a harness to your bed and strap in, wear plate armor at all times”.

Not exactly practical.

There are ways to improve security without immobilizing yourself.

Blocking the widespread distribution and use of an app that sends personal and national data to a hostile government actively collecting and using that data to conduct digital and electoral attacks is not immobilizing, it’s a simple step with zero downside that safeguards hundreds of millions of people.

Yikes, what a flawed set of premises.

" What if Canada did the same thing to the US? They did!"

No, they didn’t. Canada tried to boost Canadian media presence on American streaming platforms.

Making sure gooby gets an international viewing is very different from transmitting information to an overtly hostile government known for cyber attacks on its international peers.

“The platform isn’t a national security threat”.

It’s a fact that the app TikTok is based off of, Douyin, sends the private data of every user straight to bytedance, owned in powerful minority stake by the Chinese government and that tiktok did the same thing with US user data until they promised they stopped a couple years ago.

As of January 2024 however, whoops, US citizen data(names, birthdates, location) is still being sent back to bytedance: https://www.wsj.com/tech/tiktok-pledged-to-protect-u-s-data-1-5-billion-later-its-still-struggling-cbccf203?mod=followamazon

It’s not some baseless concern, it’s a national security consequence against data disclosures that were already carried out and have continued to this year despite assurances 2 years ago that data leaks to bytedance are not happening.

“Instrument of soft power”

Marvel movies becoming super popular internationally is an example of soft power. Gathering the personal information of users with a continuing precedent attacking US digital infrastructures and democratic institutions is not soft power, it is hostile statecraft.

I am not a proponent of monolithic tech companies nor am I particularly aligned against international competition in tech supremacy, but this ban isn’t about theoretical cultural competition.

This tiktok ban is about the recent gathering of personal information that can be used to assess and attack digital infrastructures and electoral behaviors by entities that are continually attacking digital infrastructures and electoral processes, entities focused on consolidating power not within some international free market of soft cultural influence but by gathering and consolidating power and using that power to forward state ambitions.

You aren’t trying to clutch pearls, but your pearls were just so available you felt you had to jump on the bandwagon to reply to a two-day old comment?

Nobody said this was a theoretical concern and it’s okay if you don’t understand the phrases " protest too much" and "shtick“, but you can ask for the definitions and relevance directly instead of fishing.

Are they pretending everyone knows what that is?

Ah, one of the “using words they don’t understand” crew.

And several hours late, too.

Swinging for the fences, aren’t you?

Nope, not my takes.

But go off

You’re hitting that “protest too much” shtick pretty hard