No, this is independent on AI. AI for big tech is a core product, like a car for BMW. The layoffs are completely unrelated to AI, and related to stock price and interest rates of borrowing money. None of the layoff employee has been substituted by AI. It’s pure old school finance

Unrelated news in a single title just to attract readers. Usual sh**y to ride the AI hate bandwagon

What a weird title. They are completely 2 different, independent things. Just to be categorized with AI hype articles…

Why is that? Most car already have voice assistants to help in tasks that would ve distracting for the driver. What’s the difference with chatGPT?

How is it useful? Dessert vs food?

“At the end of the lunch nowadays everyone want to have a dessert, but this is wrong because they should have food”…

The sentence AI vs algorithms sounds pretty much like this

AI is a broad family of statistical and simulation algorithms.

They don’t replace algorithms, they are algorithms very powerful for some cases. For other cases they are less powerful, or overkill and they shouldn’t be used. But there is no dichotomy, as one (AI) is part of the other (algorithms)

It’s not an average machine though. It’s a non-linear predictive system. Averages suck in non-linear predictions

What is a linux apologist?

Thanks I never understood what a server was in discord…

I would say that that’s is what you want. We don’t have a survey on user intentions.

I for instance would like to block furry instances, as an example, but I have nothing against their users. I don’t care if someone is into furry, I simply don’t want to see it myself

I haven’t experienced myself the issue. I trust your experience, but I cannot completely reproduce/describe it, as I am not selfhosting. I couldn’t answer in case of questions from developers regarding this.

Best would be for you to report this. You can create an issue here:

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues

There is a simple template to fill, and you can copy and paste most text from this thread.

Creating a product of any size is about planning.

If you notify here, your information will be lost in 2 days. People forget, and move on to the next hot topic. Relevant stakeholders might very well completely miss this post, because they are not 24/7 on lemmy.

The way to make it more relevant is going in the place where the planning is done, i.e. Github for lemmy. Open an issue there, explain the problem and describe possible solution. Come back to lemmy, link the issue and ask people to react to it (i.e. show it is relevant for them).

This is the best way to obtain what you ask. Social media platforms are too broad and fuzzy for tracking real issues.

This is also why you see a lot of work is done on performances of sql of lemmy backend, because most issues in the past on github concerned that.

This is my suggestion. If you really care about this being implemented, open a ticket on github and follow the discussion there. If you see there is not enough traction ask help to fellow lemmings.

Suggestions for the github issue are:

• be very specific
• be polite
• suggest solutions

If your solution is good, great, if not, people are more willing to think about a problem to show stranger on the internet they are wrong

Did you opened an issue on github?

You are wording this as a clickbait news article.

You find an issue, you report it to the right channel, you notify it. Good. This is how software development work, with active community reporting issues.

But why using such tone?

Publish or perish, that’s why

Of all modern languages, why java? Which will likely soon become legacy for backend applications

Thanks. Main problem I see with p2p is that it needs to gain a bit of traction, an active community behind it. Let’s see if it gets the traction needed

Have anyone tried it?

If that happens

git remote set-url origin newurl

Not saying self hosting the remote is not a good idea, just that the risk you mention is not so dramatic

If I teach a neural network to draw with only my picture, the art is mine and of all people who contributed to creating the AI technology, including theory, software, hardware (because each of them contribute to the final result as much as the training data - even more in reality)…

If I teach someone to draw, and I am the only input he’s ever had in his life, art is his, but I contributed to it.

Computers are not people

Mark twain was created by natural precesses such as evolution, by randomness and by education/environment. It is a different thing.

AI is tha peak product of the collaboration of many human beings across generations. Scientists, engineers, artists, common people, all have “worked” together to generate an amazing, extraordinary, artificial thing.

If such things can create art, that art is made by everyone, just like honey is the final product of the whole colony of bees.

We simply need to change our perspective on fame. No one deserves fame, we all deserve to be celebrated

Because an AI is created by humans. If an AI can create art, that art is ultimately created by humans