Zuck is at least a close runner up.

Something about this is absolutely hilarious to me. Sad though when thinking about it critically.

18 Republicans also opposed the budget. If every Democrat had joined the 18 Republicans in saying no, this budget would not have been approved

This is usually by design to protect risky seats and give the impression that they were opposed for political points. In essence those 18 Republicans are only enabled to vote no because they know Dems are supporting this passing. If more Dems voted no, less Republicans would have.

Totally worth it to read the second and third. The first book almost feels unrelated but it’s got some crucial context that gets built on to the extreme later Easily my top 5 sci-fi

Think about where AI was 10 years ago. Cutting edge AI was able to accept an video, and put bounding boxes around a predefined set of objects it’s able to recognize (see You Only Look Once paper, 2015). That was about it.

10 years before that, cutting edge AI was maybe digit recognition. I’m not sure.

Your own understanding of history is incorrect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_artificial_intelligence?wprov=sfla1

I have no comment on this vid or the scishow, but you’re comment is ignorant on the reality of progression of ai-related fields. Having computers “learn” has been a thing for much longer than 20 years.

Bigots, often. No offence to the person you are replying to (they said they default partner = same sex) but really it’s mostly just people who refuse to broaden their worldview or accept neutral descriptive terms. Partner could mean any number of things and to assume it’s just a same sex couple is ignorant.

Oops my mistake Thanks for the correction

Anyone got a link to the original JP Morgan report? Tomshardware didn’t

Uhh, going to need to see some evidence of that. Literally never heard of non indie devs getting royalties or continued payments based off the success of the game.

Actually I’ll correct myself, rockstar is the only company I’ve heard of that does big internal payouts post launch. Most of Rockstars game launches have resulted in new houses for some of their teams.

Got any other examples to share?

Maybe, but if I wanted to read what a LLM said I’d have asked myself.

https://distantprovince.by/posts/its-rude-to-show-ai-output-to-people/

Oh so the OP of this thread is just worried for no reason (about krisp). That’s great news!

But it’s likely I already agreed to the strings when I agreed to my company’s demand that we use Teams.

Bingo. The licenses were agreed to when the product was purchased, not when you click “yes, ok, show me the tutorial”

I mean it sucks and I don’t use these tools either despite them being forced into my work machine, but if you’re getting psychic damage every morning bc the pop up you could just click through it and ignore the shit tools from there. That’s all I’m saying, your sanity is worth clicking a few buttons.

Great. Sorry for confusing you with my vague “your company did x” in my previous reply. I was trying to refer to the OP commenter I replied to in this thread. If a feature is enabled and provisioned to you, it’s largely true that your company has already accepted the license agreement for you to use it. I wish my company didn’t shove ai everywhere but many are and as employees (in the US atelast) we don’t have any ability to not agree to these terms.

This is incorrect, the license agreement is accepted upon purchase and provisioning to users. You, as a user, clicking through the onboarding tutorial is not the license agreement.

It’s a work computer and your it team and legal department has already approved usage of these tools. Sure, you do whatever you think is right but your company has already agreed to that license. You are already bound by it through your employment and usage of employer provided tools

It’s a work computer (it has teams on it). It’s already enabled and collecting data as approved by the IT team. Why do you care?

You could just click yes, do whatever two minute intro it has and then ignore the feature forever from there.

Instead you click no every time and complain that it pops up again the next time, knowing that it’ll pop up again tomorrow

Listen I hate these tools too but you have a solution here that’ll make it so the tool will stop pestering you so that you can truly ignore it.

I don’t agree with the first but totally do the second. The Republican party fell in line and bridge divides across factions for the purpose of winning the government. Dems can’t seem to get past their ideological purity tests. Do you really think classic Republicans like maga? Fuck no they don’t, but they like winning and winning keeps them in power.

You have to win to run a government and shape it how you please. Period.

The data labels tell us it’s showing the market cap of these companies at time of acquisition and time of sale for Berkshire positions. It does not tell us how large Berkshires positions were

Usually due to laws rules and regulations holding their words/actions to account…