2·
7 months agosounds like it’s time to allow third-party clients distribute the server software, shut down free “servers” and offer paid hosting and support. that would cut costs a great deal.
HACKthePRISONS
you should know i am earnest. i’m learning how to snark. i try to say what i mean and mean what i say.
sometimes i do try to make jokes, but I am not sarcastic.
- 0 Posts
- 142 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
Cake day: October 3rd, 2020
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
>But with others already able to exploit that, why would Proton want to do that?
to comply with a warrant
use the service, and tell them to use it. just like how they made you use discord. and you can whine every time they refuse.
they could ship malicious js to their frontend that would give them access to the unencrypted session. you are going on faith every time you load the interface.
I don’t trust them because they don’t use established security practices and their interfaces abstract away the internals and they have complied with law enforcement and admitted they could compromise contents(not just metadata) and they don’t accept anonymous payment.
I don’t trust proton and I don’t know why anyone would
do you trust the person who signed it? if not, dont fucking trust it.
what more needs to be done?
what’s wrong with simple cryptographic signatures?
why do I need a block chain?
this is exactly why section 230 exists. sites aren’t responsible for what other people post and they are allowed to moderate however they want.
the law that protected concerted organizing activity is the same that took the teeth out of the unions. i want to see that law abolished, but i’m an anarchist, so i want them all gone.
concerted organizing activity is protected under the law. talking about it with your boss yourself is not organizing activity. talking about it with a coworker in front of your boss is.
this is what a job journal is for. it would prove what happened.
anarchists have had to deal with this for over a century. the state can go fuck itself.
they could develop new features but intentionally implement them in a way that they are not compatible with other services. they could put all the other instances they federate with on rolling blackouts so that it seems like they are down when in fact it’s just them cutting the connection. doing just these two things with purpose could make it look like Facebook has the most advanced and stable instance. in addition, as you mentioned, it would also have the biggest populace. there would be pressure to abandon other instances to join that instance to stay in touch.
again, this is easily disprovable. you are paranoid
again, this is easily disprovable. you are paranoid
first, i don’t use capitalization, my account is years older, we talk about (almost) entirely disparate topics, and we have conflicting political views. you’d never catch me saying this:
"The GOP intends to coup. "
and my posting history will back that up.
first, i don’t use capitalization, my account is years older, we talk about (almost) entirely disparate topics, and we have conflicting political views. you’d never catch me saying this:
"The GOP intends to coup. "
and my posting history will back that up.
again, this is easily disprovable. you are paranoid
there are web clients for mumble