You’re right - this is fucking stupid… Unfortunately, it’ll capture the business of small time shops that don’t know better
You’re right - this is fucking stupid… Unfortunately, it’ll capture the business of small time shops that don’t know better
Thanks, that brings done useful context here
I really fail to see the problem. The open source community has long had a tendency for wacky names.
I’ve been wondering about this a little, if the exposure is greater than just increased spam and phishing risk (due to PII info being breached).
If they’ve got hashed credit card details and the last 4 digits, could they fire guesses at the hashes (just like l0phtcrack for CCs instead of windows SAM databases)?
How much risk is there to people’s personal funds via their credit cards?
So, there’s this thing called Java…
That would be awesome!
Cracking insight - well done!
Yeah, but back then you Americans had a government. I can’t see it happening with your current circus.
The EU, however, is already looking at MS over teams monopoly practises (fucking finally!), I’m hoping edge and copilot/bing are on their radar too!
Holy shit, really?
My change controls written in comic sans are going to a new level!
It’s great to see some progressive web developments after all these years of regressive trash
I tried to follow this but my brain is fried (and it’s only lunch time!)
One thing it got me thinking about (and I was surprised by the conclusion I came to), was it’s often brought up how the training models are black boxes that are proprietary - but we all know the data was whatever public records they could scrape from the internet, be it reddit or whatever.
Such a thing didn’t exist for them to use in a licenced manner, they were innovating - so I’m naively wondering why is it a problem when they took the risk of using the data and presumably paid tremendously low wages to people to prune and train it from 3rd world countries
They still had to build the thing and pay to run it, train it and mature it. The risk was all theirs, why is it a problem that they’re now hoping to profit from that?
We’re upset at the greedy little pig boy spez for licencing it to them, but we did chuck all our thoughts up on the bathroom wall for all to see. It’s not like there was anything private about it.
I do like the approach of changing the incentives, but that will need regulation to force the capitalists to behave, so I guess we’ll just have to wait for the EU to form a plan.
Just a low-level filter that inspects and vetos things (think anti virus)
Awesome tool, that one. Not often we use it (and usually inside a virtual application environment), but it’s great to rely on…
Obviously their efficiency claims are ‘exaggerated’ as well…
Interesting idea, but surely the cost savings are largely pushed forward onto the plane towing all the extra weight?
Exactly - I expect a rise, to be honest. However, I’m also aware of some personal bias…
Someone made a really good point, that putting safety filters around the prompts is really just a band aid. Ideally, it needs to have not been in the training data to begin with…
Obviously that’s not going to fly with ‘our’ get rich quick approach to anything GenAI.
Having just written that, I’m wondering if we’re better off having filters at the other end, emulating what we do as parents (concealing knowledge/nuance I don’t want children picking up on), so it filters what it says?
Huh… We’ll see, I guess
It’s so ridiculous I’m not even going to bother with the article
Wow, that’s some amazing stuff! Really looking forward to more of this globally…