Can the U.S. “Intelligence” tell us these extremists were inspired by whom?

Thank you kind lemming

Have you bought a TV in the last 5 years?

Long gone are the days when I used be excited to read update notes for new features… Now I just hope they don’t god damn force an update on me.

So basically an OS. The only difference is that the OS developer doesn’t control or make all the apps (features). Which I think is good for competition, but bad for tight integration.

But this is exactly what we like to avoid from Google and Apple. Perhaps, it can work in China because of strong Govt oversight (read: control), but not in U.S…

TL;DR over from Puget reddit accounts is that their overall failure rates for all chips is very low because they run it at tightly controlled base specs.

So any automatic boosting/OC doesn’t come in play here, which might be why Intel chips are failing more in the broader user space.

What?

I looked it up but don’t understand it.

Actually, I think it’s not about defect numbers. This is about delaying until Intel releases the microcode update. They want to be compared after the (potentially) performance tanking update from Intel. Which is hilarious because Intel gave a date after AMD’s initial launch date.

I think it’s also fair as a lot of reviewers aren’t going to bother retesting after Intel releases updates and comparing with AMD after the 9000 series hype has died down, if they had just recently did so for the AMD launch.

Nah something fishy

You can’t explain it!

I understand the cynicism. But if you’ve been following this topic, Intel really fucked with some huge customers (businesses) here. And AMD was already stealing their lunch with their previous gen processors.

Why does “nothing but” and “all but” mean the same thing?

Did you just put “repairable” and “Apple” in the same sentence?

Obviously a stunt.

Thanks for the link. The article is a whole lot of nothingburger. The entire premise of the article is that Kaspersky works as intended (just as any other security software) to flag files with certain phrases. Therefore, it can be used to find classified markings. Therefore, Kaspersky is bad… What?

So we should just ban all security software?

Why is it so hard to find a single piece of evidence that Kaspersky fucked up, or that their software has something in particular that is more risky compared to other security software. Anyone with more knowledge can explain plz?

Sounds like there is some other motive for doing this. Or they found something they aren’t willing to tell us. But why?

Please watch the video, it’s worth it over all the dumb shit we spend time on online. Tech Jesus was able to get the attention of the highest level of management responsible for customer service and got them to make (12) tangible commitments to their customers who were screwed by ASUS.

He did it very professionally and in an effective way, and constantly maintained the goal of the discussion (which you can tell is not to make inflammatory and accusatory content that will get clicks, but to get his viewers proper support and refunds from ASUS).

I’ve never seen a YouTube channel go to this length to actually take an action against a company for a specific issue in the interest of the consumers and get results (as opposed to just making videos to bring awareness).

The video fails to explain what about this is “AI” as opposed to active noise cancelling with some regular old signal processing.

The article didn’t bother to link the paper. Also odd way to put it to say it “increases signature”. Like, have they found a way to throw radar reflecting goo on the F-22?

No, this is essentially about networked radars. Which would be interesting if they bothered to discuss the tech. I suppose I’ll wait for Sandboxx News to cover it.

You’re thinking with capitalism of the yesteryear.

How does one “move” to a different instance? Or do I have to make a new account and start over?