The short version is that Meta see any type of competitors has a treat to its capital. It will do whatever is needed to fight it and destroy it. They introduced stories for Snapchat, reels for TikTok, etc. With the fediverse, they federate to extinguish it.
Who didn’t this coming? Seriously, meta will take what they want to increase the capital and makes everything else invisible.
Fediverse isn’t here to say yes to everything. We have the freedom to say no and this is the power of the fediverse. It’s allowing and denying. And Meta is a threat to the fediverse.
The first thing to do is not connecting a printer to internet.
You can just install the PlayIntegrityFix module. It works again.
Google doing shit and it’s fine to circumvent it.
It’s my point. I never ever wrote the term doesn’t exist nor the term isn’t valid.
My sentence wasn’t that litteral. It’s pseudoscientific crap marketing. “Quantum security” isn’t “survive attacks using quantum computers”. It’s completely pedantic.
The issue with this usage is that the meaning of the words disappears.
Quantum or tell me that you fall in the pseudoscientific trap.
Elon could self masturbate. It’s cheaper than losing billions with a toy.
This will be an unpopular opinion here.
I’m not against AI but the rules have to be in laws and regulations. First, AI can’t use copyrighted material without paying for it. It can’t either use material without asking individually.
The second point is that AI can’t created copyrighted material. Whatever an AI created, it’s free of copyright and everyone can use it.
Third, an AI can’t be a blackbox. It has to be comprehensive how it works and what the AI is doing. A solution would be to have source available code.
Fourth, AI can’t violate laws, create and push misinformation, and material used for misinforming.
And, of course, anything created using AI has to be indentified as such.
The money is in what the AI can do, the quality of the result, and the quality of the code. All the other things isn’t valuable.
In this case, the title is misleading. It’s not the ECJ, it’s the ECHR. The ECHR isn’t part of the EU even if the EU and the EU members recognize it.
The ECHR rules according to the ECHR and not the EU regulations. The court can overturn EU regulation when violating the Human Rights.
Alternative title: Capitalism doesn’t care about morals and contracts. It wants to make more money.
I’m not pretending AI isn’t useful. There is plenty of field where AI helps. But, AI has been the next scam after blockchain, crypto, NFT…
It’s the end of our civilization with falling capitalism. But, capitalism will try to find new ways to make short term profits. We moved from fordism to post-fordism with the enslavement of the cognitive abilities. We entered the next era with all these scams. And entshitification is a symptom of this.
But regulations are bad and the free market is good! /s
More good news! Please!
I didn’t get in the details. But, of course, a such regulation includes the availability of the firmware.
By the way, I read that it’s in the EU. The regulation applies in the EEA (EU+Norway+Iceland+Liechtenstein).
Apple is testing the limits but will finally comply with the regulation by opening without gatekeeping.
They try of it pass, it pass and if it doesn’t, they comply.
EU should double down with a regulation stipulating that people are free to install whatever OS they want on devices (smartphones included) and companies can’t gatekeep it.
The EU said they will be no exceptions. It’s open or open.
At least, you can change your DNS to one who blocks ads. It’s not as efficient as uBlock origin and system wide on Android. But, it’s better than nothing.