• 12 Posts
  • 118 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 27th, 2023

help-circle
  • A noble goal in mind and I’m glad that the output of ChatGPT works for you. I’m not against LLMs in principle, but anything freshly spat out by an LLM is for you and you only. If AI was only used as an aid but you understand the codebase, document it and make it clear. Otherwise, you leave the assumption of vibe-coding open.












  • idk man, but I’d still much rather have encryption, even if I’m up against the alphabet boys:

    • They’ll be up a creek if I escape, die, or vanish into the woods first
    • If I hid a disk somewhere, I’d rather know they found it when they come to torture me, than have it inspected without hearing a word
    • If all else fails, they’ll at least have to expend a modicum of effort and resources to fight me

  • What’s the point of life if crippling, paralyzing fear is all there is to it? I work on being a good steward of my privacy as much as it brings me joy and satisfaction, not so much that it consumes every waking hour.

    Whatever it is, review your threat model. What’s done is done and there is little that can be done to redact any evidence you may have left on the internet. Are you able to stop doing whatever it is that is putting you at risk of legal trouble?

    If it’s an drug or psychological problem, you need to seek professional medical attention. Many people die or suffer life-changing illness each year fearing that their doctors will rat them out for substance abuse. Don’t be one of them. Patient privacy laws, at least in the US, prevent your doctors, therapists, etc. will protect you if you go and seek help. The main thing that they would have to disclose is if you make direct, credible threats to other people.

    If it’s a criminal operation or worse, lawyer up and good luck.


  • I’m ready to be called milquetoast, and while I see where this comes from, it comes off idealistic if we are to communicate with people in the present day in any practical way. Do not forget how much of an improvement it already is over the likes of proprietary messaging apps and how much effort it already is to move people to Signal. It is surprisingly difficult for common folk to grasp the concept of anything but a phone number when it comes to messaging apps.





  • Conceptually, it’s a messaging app done right. Not haunted by legacy identifiers like phone numbers, can be run in a decentralized manner, and a more secure invite system.

    In practice, it tends to burn through battery, and it’s already hard enough getting people to use Signal. People also seem to have a hard time grasping the concepts of invites, or anything that’s not a phone number for that matter.

    I’ve stopped using it due to the battery issue and I don’t want to fragment my communication strategy further. It ought to have a privacy advantage by virtue of not needing a phone number, but at the end of the day, my messages are also getting swept up on the other end by non-privacy-respecting phones.




  • What a shitty banking app. The malware explanation could just be customer service boilerplate. They might have just implemented some commercial fingerprinting/analysis/security library in the app that freaked out at the minimal fingerprint of the GrapheneOS profile and defaulted to locking you out.

    As individuals, we need to continue defending and advocating for our privacy - using privacy-respecting phones and software even if it’s difficult and organize against surveillance capitalism, or at least donate to existing advocacy groups. And the developers that make privacy-respecting alternatives more accessible. Not much of an easy way out since we’re up against Big Tech on a profoundly uneven playing field.

    But for immediate issues like this, I would get a cheap separate phone with regular Android to handle the app if the bank doesn’t offer the same services through a browser. Try to keep it on an isolated network and only power it on when necessary.