![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Well, he did lose on Jeopardy, so I guess to balance it out he must have all the answers?
I ran from Reddit, it be like that
Well, he did lose on Jeopardy, so I guess to balance it out he must have all the answers?
AI will continue to be shoved into every aspect of all of its products until morale improves
Stahp! I can only get so hard!
Yes, they will. We’ve seen it before in mostly less serious cases: Diginotar, Türktrust, Symantec, etc. As brittle as the CA system can be, when there is real enough trouble, CAs do get revoked.
I agree, it’s far from perfect.
You are technically correct, best kind of correct
It is indeed true that some CAs have seriously misbehaved; however, browser builders are rather strict on the presence of the CAs they trust. Misbehaving or even simple errors are reasons for getting kicked out, after which certificates signed by those CAs are now no longer valid.
This is a great question.
The obvious answer is to then go to London.
But if you are unable to do so AND have no mobile network, you can download the maps via avian carrier.
Far from any desire to give kudos to Google: Maps does allow offline maps.I had greater London available on my iphone recently, and that worked.
Please don’t insult the pigs, they’re smart and sensitive creatures
Stupid monoculture is the cause, but let’s not fix that.
Err wat? No it isn’t.
Few people think a criminal would be a good judge, and so I don’t think e.g. Facebook should be talking about this without fixing their own misdeeds, not spend boatloads of money lobbying against it. All these big tech bros are currently doing is throwing mud at each other (Google complaining about RCS in iMessage while at the same time breaking it themselves) - literally none of them is making any significant changes. So yeah, I think they should shut the F up and start doing something themselves.
Is Apple acting in bad faith? Sure they are. But except for Mozilla and Proton, I see nothing but violently unethical Evil Corps, that soak the merest click in more trackers and profiling than there are humanoids in our galaxy, that sell this data to everyone and their mothers, that force you to pay undivided to the worst of humanity, interspersed with ads for miscellaneous utter garbage and burn up poor brown people moderating the illegal stuff passing by in their “social” feeds.
Probably because Apple a while ago, made it just a bit harder to track idevice users.
Honestly, I hope you’re right. I’m a frayed knot though.
No, a ruthless evil genius. I think loads of people are going to subscribe, and they can therefore be categorised as delusional.
It’s not necessarily the stuff you post, I actually think they don’t give a toss about your shoddy announcement of breakfast or casual whatevers. But they do love to collect your meta-data, to slap some ultra targeted ads right in your drooling facade and sell your profile to other advertisers for lolz and profit. Your IP address, your age and preferences, and the things you really like (for example your clicks on “like” but also your eye movements, your pauses when scrolling) instead of the things you say you like, tracking you across the whole goddamn internet. Also, you don’t need to be on Facebook at all to get tracked and sold (shadow profiles are the absolute shit).
Not the NFTs themselves so much, but the code development to integrate it with reddit for example.
I’m always having a hard time keeping me dry when I read something about Meta, Google and Microsoft being _so ethical _ Hi-la-ri-ous. No Tommy Cooper or Spike Milligan made me laugh so much.
Probably, or employees’ families maybe?
“That’s a nice little nephew you got there, it would be a shame if something happened to him “.