This seems like very standard ML. I’m not surprised it works, but also it likely takes a huge amount of training data (i.e. print samples) to recognize a specific machine.

I’ve done stuff like this. For instance I took a pre-trained model that could identify animals and used reinforcement learning to feed it thousands of annotated images of my cats. After this fine-tuning it could reliably tell the difference between them. Useful? Yes. Neat? Yes. But it’s not like it can identify a cat it’s never been trained on.

So it’s interesting and useful, but not as impressive or useful as the article makes it seem.

Also I’m sure something as simple as changing a nozzle or even what slicer is used would completely throw it off.

I really like this game. Agreed with the other comment about the endgame being a little weak but it’s still early in development and the content they’ve added has been great.

Ironically AI would probably work ok here whereas excel is using a human-designed pattern matching heuristic that apparently either has a bug or didn’t take into account your locale properly. I say that as someone with a relatively negative opinion of ai

This is a task ai would do well at whereas most of the Excel workflow it would not.

It’s actually because January is also misspelled. Or possibly because Excel’s language/region isn’t set up right (I see your month abbreviations aren’t us-eng… If excel is in us-eng it likely isn’t going to identify them properly.

All of his books are just wonderful.